[gentoo-user] Re: out of disk space to compile webkit-gtk

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 00:53:16 -0700, Joseph wrote: I'm upgrading the system and running out of disk space to compile webkit-gtk [..] How do I tell the system to use /home partition to use for compiling temp tiles? portage.env allows per-package environment variables. This will use two

[gentoo-user] Re: how to use my SSD the right way ;-)

On Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:59:29 +0200, Anton Shumskyi wrote: Hi, there is a native queuing at my INTEL SSD 64GB, so i'v set noop scheduler via udev rules. And it's kind a luggish when deleting a lot files like kernel sources (at ext4,xfs,btrfs, FS makes no difference, some cheap That's the

[gentoo-user] Re: llvm compile error

Before this gets out of hand.. On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:44:38 +0100, Silvio Siefke wrote: llvm-3.4 is not hardmasked. It is marked ~x86 which is something very different. Correct, i mean Clang in version 3.4 is hardmasked. I want install clang alone llvm i not need. I think mesa use llvm

[gentoo-user] Re: cpufrequtils can't find expected /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq

On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:13:39 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 02:27:05 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: [aa1][root][/usr/src/linux] /etc/init.d/cpufrequtils start * Caching service dependencies ... [ ok ] * Running cpufreq-set --governor conservative --

[gentoo-user] Re: re: which NTPd package to use?

On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:05:23 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: Which NTPd package would the list recommend using, ntp, openntpd, or some other package? chrony - no competition, even for servers. ntpd is way overrated, unnecessarily hard to setup correctly, fragile and contrary to popular belief

[gentoo-user] Re: re: which NTPd package to use?

On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 21:14:04 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: Is this gentoo wiki article still relevant when it comes to configuring chrony on gentoo? http://www.gentoo-wiki.info/Chrony Or should I stick to the instructions given here: /usr/share/doc/chrony-1.29.1/chrony.txt.bz2 The wiki

[gentoo-user] Re: Do I really need to install new packages during upgrade?

On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:21:35 +0300, Gevisz wrote: I have just tried to upgrade my system (which I do almost every day) and found out that portage wants to install 6 new python packages that seem to be unnecessary because for example # equery depends dev-python/pyopenssl reports that no

[gentoo-user] Re: Q: How is that terminus technicus for...

On Sun, 16 Nov 2014 14:49:02 +0100, meino.cramer wrote: I connected a Arietta.G25 via Ethernet over USB (using a simple USB cable and hardware USB-Ethernet Adaptor to my Gentoo PC. I can ssh on that little tiny board. Now I want to access the internat from within the Arietta. Therefore all

[gentoo-user] Re: ceph on gentoo?

On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 21:54:00 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: At least for the future ... now that btrfs is declared stable at least Yeah, no. 3.18 is finally OK-ish (after they missed the .17 merge window with a huge number of fixes) but you really want to wait for 3.19. In the other

[gentoo-user] Re: ceph on gentoo?

On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 22:24:30 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Holger Hoffstätte holger.hoffstae...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 21:54:00 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: In the other direction: what protects against these errors you mention? ceph

[gentoo-user] Re: [NOTE] New default behavior in latest nfs-utils (1.3.2-r1)

On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:33:53 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: didn't read the whole thread, sorry ... but I also noticed my nfsv4-server stopped working with that latest update. Some systemd-service-files were renamed and/or removed, right? No, it's (ironically) a systemd-specific bug.

[gentoo-user] Re: per-package CFLAGS

On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:35:35 +0100, Raffaele BELARDI wrote: I have a package failing build (media-tv/mythtv). One resource on the net suggests using the -fno-devirtualize gcc flag. Google tells me that the way to do that would be something like $ echo CFLAGS=\${CFLAGS} -fno-devirtualize\

[gentoo-user] Re: This nite's switch to full multilib

On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:14:29 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: OK, then so why do I have to edit files to tell the system to USE this and that after the system tells me it needs that ... ? Why isn't this taken care of within portage itself? I don't *want* to decide 32bit or not ... (I like that

[gentoo-user] Re: Moving from no-multilib to (true) multilib

On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:20:23 +0100, Mick wrote: Given that the emul-linux-x86 package sets are now deprecated and we can now with USE=abi_x86_32 emerge our own 32bit libraries where needed, is it now easier to move from a no-multilib to a multilib environment, or will it still require a

[gentoo-user] Re: This nite's switch to full multilib

On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:44:59 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:15:01 + (UTC), Holger Hoffstätte wrote: Portage does not override your choices, and it certainly does not allow one single ebuild to automagically change the behaviour of multiple other ebuilds

[gentoo-user] Re: This nite's switch to full multilib

On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:14:55 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: On 30/03/2015 12:42, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: You want skype. Skype is 32bit. So far, we're good. You put an entry in package.use to enable abi_x86_32 for skype. Except..at that point you would have already failed. That does

[gentoo-user] Re: Easy (cough) way to build earlier gentoo-sources 3.18.x kernel?

On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 23:22:58 +0100, Bob Wya wrote: I'm getting a bit bogged down trying to build an early release of the 3.18 kernel. Since I can't automatically go back before 3.18.9 now (using portage anyway)... Basically I trying to check if a suspend/resume issue I've got was

[gentoo-user] Re: Easy (cough) way to build earlier gentoo-sources 3.18.x kernel?

On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:47:24 +0100, Bob Wya wrote: @Holger, that's my symptoms to tee... :-) Strangely it doesn't effect Arch Linux - running on the same box - with a newer 3.19.2 kernel. So they must have a patch for the issue (but I can't figure out what). Perhaps I'll check through the

[gentoo-user] Re: CFLAGs for kernel compilation

On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:18:23 +0200, Ralf wrote: Damn, you're absolutely right. I just tested it using make V=1. kernel make does override CFLAGs from the outside. But that's interesting: my processor supports -march=core-avx2 and none of the linux kernel processor family uses this

[gentoo-user] Re: plugin-containers missing libraries

On Wed, 27 May 2015 09:54:33 +1000, Adam Carter wrote: Is this working looking into? The programs generally work ok, so this is more for interests sake. # ldd /usr/lib64/firefox/plugin-container | grep not libmozalloc.so = not found libxul.so = not found This is normal, look at

[gentoo-user] Re: Installing BTRFS on MBR with OpenRC

On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 07:18:08 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: I'll skip the bits that were already dealt with. On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote: First, btrfs balance. I had no idea that was needed, so of course I didn't include it in my attempts. Could

[gentoo-user] Re: testing system + gcc-5.2 anyone?

On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:01:50 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote: On 08/10/2015 05:29:04 PM, James wrote: Hello, Just for grins, I'm thinking about installing a gentoo system that is (~) testing and newer codes and setting gcc-.5.2 as the default compiler. Anyone doing this yet? Will it mostly

[gentoo-user] Re: testing system + gcc-5.2 anyone?

On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 05:18:54 -0400, covici wrote: Holger Hoffstätte wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:01:50 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote: On 08/10/2015 05:29:04 PM, James wrote: Hello, Just for grins, I'm thinking about installing a gentoo system that is (~) testing and newer codes

[gentoo-user] Re: portage 2.2.21: rsync_excludes no longer taken into account

On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:38:20 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Holger Hoffstätte > <holger.hoffstae...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> After today's update to ~portage-2.2.21 rsync gives more more than I >> asked for on repo update; it see

[gentoo-user] portage 2.2.21: rsync_excludes no longer taken into account

After today's update to ~portage-2.2.21 rsync gives more more than I asked for on repo update; it seems rsync_excludes is no longer read or observed. It's specified in PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS and of course the file with the exclusions exists etc. This has worked for aeons. Does anybody know

[gentoo-user] Re: Symbols missing from Firefox

On Wed, 01 Jun 2016 17:02:24 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: >> Do you use NoScript? If yes, does it allow webfonts? > > I should have said that the only extra I have is AdBlock Plus. Disabling it > makes no difference. And your hint reminded me to install YesScript, which > also makes no

[gentoo-user] Re: Failed to set XATTR_PAX markings

On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 10:54:56 +, Martin Vaeth wrote: > the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> >> grep CONFIG_TMPFS_XATTR /usr/src/linux/.config >> CONFIG_TMPFS_XATTR=y > > Does your compilation happen on a temp file system? > You can configure XATTR for each file system

[gentoo-user] Re: Thunderbird 45.0 unreadable fonts

On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 02:38:00 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > I upgraded thunderbird-bin from 38.7.0 to 45.0 and all window fonts > became extremely washed-out, thin and generally unreadable. I then wiped > the configuration files (mv ~/.thunderbird ~/tb_backup), but got the > same issue. It

[gentoo-user] Re: Is "-fomit-frame-pointer" a gcc default?

On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 19:23:24 -0600, "J." García wrote: > El lun, 11-07-2016 a las 20:47 -0400, waltd...@waltdnes.org escribió: >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 01:48:37AM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote >> >> > so it is not turned on on x86. Not sure about amd64. IIRC it is >> > default >> > on

[gentoo-user] Re: Missing CPU options in make menuconfig

On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 18:50:56 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: > I'm trying to do something with a vanilla kernel from kernel.org. Under > Processor type and features/Processor family, there are only a handful of > choices, whereas my portage-installed gentoo-sources lists many more. > > The help page

[gentoo-user] portage in git: egencache not honoring --jobs, only using single core

Hopefully easy question about portage via git (from Github); didn't find anything in bugzilla. Have been using it for a while and everything works, but the slow metadata cache updates are annoying, so I dug into the script call chain, ended up in egencache and for the life of me can't figure out

[gentoo-user] Re: Heads Up - net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0

On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:32:17 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote: > On 26/10/16 07:16, Peter Humphrey wrote: >> On Tuesday 25 Oct 2016 13:49:44 Andrés Becerra Sandoval wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0 was installed today as part of my upgrade and the >>> network (static) was broken. I

[gentoo-user] Re: should everything compile?

On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 22:25:59 +0100, lee wrote: > Holger Hoffstätte <hol...@applied-asynchrony.com> writes: > >> On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 21:09:08 +0100, lee wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> there are some things that refuse to compile. One of them

[gentoo-user] Re: should everything compile?

On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 21:09:08 +0100, lee wrote: > Hi, > > there are some things that refuse to compile. One of them is > openimageio. > > Is this a bug, or am I missing something? Do I need to update something > else first? The latter, sort of. The error in question.. [..] > | [100%] Linking

[gentoo-user] Re: Latest LLVM wants to pollute my machine with VIM stuff.....

On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 22:33:10 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote: > Hi all, > I'm still trying to come to grips with understanding ebuilds so please > bear with me if this is a simple question. I've just sync'd and then > done an > > emerge --ask -NuD world > > I have LLVM/clang installed

[gentoo-user] Re: world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

On Mon, 08 May 2017 11:57:50 +, J. Roeleveld wrote: > Only recently got my desktop converted to 5.4. > Next is my laptop. > > When that is done, I could risk 6 on my desktop. But if Dev is thinking of > skipping it Don't bother with 6, go straight to 7. I had at least one library

[gentoo-user] Re: Will profile 17.0 break 3rd party binaries?

On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 22:42:45 +, Grant Edwards wrote: > There are a number of third-party binary executables that I use > regularly on my Gentoo systems. These are dynamically linked, x86-64, > programs that typically depend on various X11 and Qt/Gtk libraries. > They were either extracted

[gentoo-user] WARNING: DO NOT update to sys-apps/attr-2.4.48

Desaster Warning Time! Unless you enjoy restoring from backups in the most creative ways, DO NOT casually install today's update of sys-apps/attr-2.4.48, or your box WILL be hosed. If you are on ~arch pmask that thing _right now_: $echo "=sys-apps/attr-2.4.48" >> /etc/portage/package.mask

[gentoo-user] Re: microcode applied?

On Mon, 08 Jan 2018 11:53:58 +, Mick wrote: > On Monday, 8 January 2018 09:05:02 GMT Max Zettlmeißl wrote: >> It seems like there are no microcode updates for your specific CPU >> bundled in linux-firmware. > > Only two out of three Intel boxen here report an early update of microcode in >

[gentoo-user] Re: microcode applied?

On Tue, 09 Jan 2018 14:21:10 +, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > On Mon, 08 Jan 2018 11:53:58 +, Mick wrote: > >> On Monday, 8 January 2018 09:05:02 GMT Max Zettlmeißl wrote: >>> It seems like there are no microcode updates for your specific CPU >>> bundled in l

[gentoo-user] Re: old kernels are installed during the upgrade

On Wed, 03 Jan 2018 15:53:07 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:35 PM, Wols Lists wrote: >> >> And as I understand it the code can be disabled with either a compile >> time option or command line switch to the kernel. > > I suspect the compile-time

[gentoo-user] Re: Rebuilding all dependants of a package

On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 22:55:45 +, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:29:42 + (UTC), Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > >> > That was useful and saved me the time to sed & grep my way through the >> > equery output. Turning this into a g

[gentoo-user] Re: Rebuilding all dependants of a package

On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:05:03 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 19/02/2018 14:55, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: >> Hey, >> >> I'm not exactly new to portage, but one thing that I cannot seem to figure >> out is how to rebuild all dependants of a package. Not *dependencie

[gentoo-user] Re: Rebuilding all dependants of a package

On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 15:29:52 +0100, Branko Grubic wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:55:08 + (UTC) > Holger Hoffstätte <hol...@applied-asynchrony.com> wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> I'm not exactly new to portage, but one thing that I cannot seem to >> figu

[gentoo-user] Rebuilding all dependants of a package

Hey, I'm not exactly new to portage, but one thing that I cannot seem to figure out is how to rebuild all dependants of a package. Not *dependencies*, dependants: packages that require said package. As a recent example: whenever go (the language) is updated to a new version (say from 1.9 to

[gentoo-user] Re: Rebuilding all dependants of a package

On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 09:56:15 +, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 15:29:52 +0100, Branko Grubic wrote: > >> On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:55:08 +0000 (UTC) >> Holger Hoffstätte <hol...@applied-asynchrony.com> wrote: >> >>> Hey, >>> &

[gentoo-user] Re: Is --changed-deps going to be *that* useless?

On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 09:46:00 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:36 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> I've been using --changed-deps when doing a world upgrade ever since the >> news item that recommended it. >> >> However, today, this is what --changed-deps

[gentoo-user] Re: Skypeforlinux does not start

On Thu, 04 Oct 2018 16:09:51 +0300, gevisz wrote: > I have just installed skypeforlinux-8.30.0.50. > > After starting from command line, it successfully does nothing. > I even do not get "permission denied" message. https://bugs.gentoo.org/666396 For some reasons 8.30.x relies on elogind. Just

[gentoo-user] Comparatively slow clang startup vs. gcc - reasons?

(paging Michał Górny..) I've noticed that clang has gotten really slow, and while it does great analysis during the various compilation stages (which is fine), the startup itself is a major contributor to perceived slowness. Nothing demonstrates this better than running ./configure in a random

[gentoo-user] Re: chrony-3.3 hangs at boot

On Mon, 03 Sep 2018 22:23:18 +0100, Mick wrote: > On Monday, 3 September 2018 19:10:52 BST Holger Hoffstätte wrote: >> On Mon, 03 Sep 2018 17:48:53 +0100, Mick wrote: >> > I just noticed today chronyd hangs during boot for a minute and a half. >> > The logs do no

[gentoo-user] Re: chrony-3.3 hangs at boot

On Mon, 03 Sep 2018 17:48:53 +0100, Mick wrote: > I just noticed today chronyd hangs during boot for a minute and a half. The > logs do not reveal anything amiss. I suspect it waits for a network > connection, which is not yet up when chronyd launches. > > Sep 3 17:38:26 asus

[gentoo-user] Re: PSA: openrc-0.41 system borkage & ro root fs on next boot

Update: looks like ~0.41.1 has fixed the problem. -h

[gentoo-user] PSA: openrc-0.41 system borkage & ro root fs on next boot

Last night openrc was updated to ~0.41, supposedly fixing [1]. Unfortunately it seems it had the opposite effect and made things worse compared to the previous 0.42.3 - the deptree is broken, rc-status remains confused and a reboot results in a read-only root fs because (I think) the runlevels

[gentoo-user] Re: openjdk?

On 4/25/19 3:17 AM, Paul B. Henson wrote: On 4/23/2019 4:31 PM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: since JDK9+, nothing else. There is no notable difference between oracle-jdk-8, icedtea-8 or openjdk-8 other than IcedTea (being the JDK-8 LTS maintained by RedHat) also containing the (awesome) Shenandoah

[gentoo-user] Re: openjdk?

On 4/24/19 12:23 AM, Paul B. Henson wrote: So Oracle java has a crappy license now, and I see on the dev list they're even talking about removing it from portage. However, openjdk has no stable version, and the ebuild contains: if use gentoo-vm ; then ewarn "WARNING! You have enabled

[gentoo-user] Re: problem dropping Python 2.7

On 9/12/19 10:13 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: As for getting around the first 3, you need to uninstall everything that depends on them and then unmerge them. I don't know how feasible that is, because some important packages probably depend on LLVM? Not sure. Right now, Python 2.7 is required

[gentoo-user] Re: problem with Fetchmail

On 12/10/19 11:03 PM, Philip Webb wrote: A few days ago, I updated Fetchmail to the latest stable 6.4.1 . Immediately, it stopped fetching mail from one of my mail forwarders ; the other one still worked, as I found by test-mailing to myself. When I reverted to 6.3.26-r4 , everything worked

[gentoo-user] Desktop-no-multilib profile - possible?

Hi, I will never ever run 32bit software again and would really like to have a desktop-no-multilib profile, in sync with the regular desktop but simply without the multilib goop. My server is running precisely as I want with plain no-multilib, and I know I could just copy my USE flags over and

[gentoo-user] Re: Desktop-no-multilib profile - possible?

Hey Francesco - On 2/20/20 11:22 AM, Francesco Turco wrote: On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, at 22:21, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: I will never ever run 32bit software again and would really like to have a desktop-no-multilib profile, in sync with the regular desktop but simply without the multilib goop

[gentoo-user] Re: Understanding fstrim...

On 4/13/20 1:55 PM, Michael wrote: I have noticed when prolonged fstrim takes place on an old SSD drive of mine it becomes unresponsive. As Rich said this is not because data is being physically deleted, only a flag is switched from 1 to 0 to indicate its availability for further writes. This

[gentoo-user] Re: zoom?

On 3/27/20 12:36 AM, Michael wrote: More info on the participation Zoom users /enjoy/, whether they like it and have agreed to it, or not: https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/k7e599/zoom-ios-app-sends-data-to-facebook-even-if-you-dont-have-a-facebook-account No need to rely on vague reports

[gentoo-user] Re: Gcc-10.1.0, anyone?

On 5/8/20 2:18 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: Afternoon all, Today's update included this latest version of gcc. I installed it, switched to it and rebuilt @system and the kernel. On booting, The system hung at its very first loading: as soon as I selected the kernel to boot, I got the usual "SHA256

[gentoo-user] Re: "emerge --jobs=1 ..." vs "MAKEOPTS=-j1 emerge ..."

On 2020-06-21 11:53, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote: Greetings, is there any difference between running "emerge --jobs=1 ..." and runn- ing "MAKEOPTS=-j1 emerge ..."? --jobs=1 starts one package build at a time, possibly using many parallel processes - depending on MAKEOPTS and how the build works.

[gentoo-user] Re: Screen/driver/xserver freezing after suspension

On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:49:35 +0100, Igor Mróz wrote: > I don't really know - I haven't installed anything. Now I'm not really sure > if this is problem with suspension or just screen resuming after "turning" it > off. I also don't have Nvidia card. > > Igor Try running xorg-server with +suid.

[gentoo-user] Re: Screen/driver/xserver freezing after suspension

On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:01:41 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Monday, January 11, 2021 2:22:27 PM CET Holger Hoffstätte wrote: >> On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:49:35 +0100, Igor Mróz wrote: >> > I don't really know - I haven't installed anything. Now I'm not really >> &

[gentoo-user] Re: x11-base/xorg-x11 masked

On 2022-10-04 08:40, w...@op.pl wrote: Hello everyone! Upon upgrade, portage told me that x11-base/xorg-x11 is masked and will be removed from the repo on November 1st. I thought "ok, why not do it now", so I have typed: # emerge -W x11-base/xorg-x11 # emerge -cav and there was a

[gentoo-user] Re: error: template with C linkage

On 2023-01-07 18:20, Helmut Jarausch wrote: Hi, for some of my (older) local ebuild I get the error template with C linkage What is the reason for this message? How can I change "C linkage" to "C++ linkage" Your C++ code opens an 'extern "C" { ..' block (maybe via included header) but

[gentoo-user] Re: Clock font in "xfce-base/xfce4-panel" version 4.17.4

On 2022-11-29 17:03, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote: Greetings, after upgrading "xfce-base/xfce4-panel" from version 4.17.3 to 4.17.4 my digital clock uses a tiny font which I cannot change. Whatever font and font size I select in its "Property" dialog is ignored. It stubbornly stays with "Sans

[gentoo-user] Re: Activating BMQ CPU Scheduler

On 2023-04-26 18:15, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: So I wanted to try the BMQ scheduler in gentoo-sources. Is just enabling it in the kernel build all that's needed? I did so, booted, and:   $ dmesg | grep -i bmq   [    0.100284] sched/bmq: BMQ CPU Scheduler v6.1-r4 by Alfred Chen. That's all

[gentoo-user] Re: Activating BMQ CPU Scheduler

On 2023-05-01 22:24, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 26/04/2023 23:06, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: On 2023-04-26 18:15, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: So I wanted to try the BMQ scheduler in gentoo-sources. Is just enabling it in the kernel build all that's needed? I did so, booted, and: $ dmesg | grep -i

[gentoo-user] Re: Openrc service crash

On 2023-04-08 10:41, Michael wrote: On Saturday, 8 April 2023 09:33:23 BST Michael wrote: On Saturday, 8 April 2023 09:32:31 BST Michael wrote: On Saturday, 8 April 2023 09:28:16 BST Arve Barsnes wrote: On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 at 10:00, Michael wrote: It was probably the addition of IPv6 - as a

[gentoo-user] Re: Activating BMQ CPU Scheduler

On 2023-05-06 14:07, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 03/05/2023 20:11, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: On 2023-05-02 21:19, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 02/05/2023 09:53, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: [...] BMQ has severe issues. When emerging something while I play a game (either native or through wine

[gentoo-user] Re: Activating BMQ CPU Scheduler

On 2023-05-02 21:19, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 02/05/2023 09:53, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: [...] Switched back to the default (called "CFS" I think.) BMQ has severe issues. When emerging something while I play a game (either native or through wine-proton,) there's long lag spikes a

[gentoo-user] Re: gentoo-sources-6.7.7 build error

On 2024-03-02 18:12, ralfconn wrote: I have a build error with latest gentoo-sources (~amd64): # eix -I gentoo-sources Installed versions: 6.7.6(6.7.6)^bs(10:37:31 02/24/24)(-build -experimental -symlink) 6.7.7(6.7.7)^bs(18:43:20 03/01/24)(-build -experimental -symlink) # eix -I gcc Installed