Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Questions about Pale Moon
On Friday, 26 January 2018 13:20:04 GMT Walter Dnes wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:43:31AM +, Peter Humphrey wrote > > > This is with gcc 4.9.4, and I get the same with gcc 6.4.0. I've only > > just noticed that about -fPIC; haven't all those problems been fixed > > by now? > > This may or may not be relavant. I build Pale Moon manually for my > home machines, using the Mozilla Firefox process. 64-bit builds worked > fine with GCC-6.4.0 on profile 13.0. Anything built with GCC-6.x under > profile 17.0 segfaults in 10-15 seconds after launching Pale Moon. A > custom-built GCC-5.4.0 builds a stable Pale Moon. I haven't yet managed to compile 27.7.1 at all with either GCC 6.4.0 or 4.9.4, using the palemoon overlay via layman, on profile default/linux/ amd64/17.0/desktop/plasma. I get the loader errors I quoted on Wednesday. I wonder whether I should try the 17.1 profile... > I'm currently doing a test build with GCC-6.4.0 on my 32-bit desktop, > having just finished the migration to 17.0. Current ICEWM 1.4.2 (and > 1.4.0) crashes out of X to a text console when I click on the menu bar > at the bottom. I've dropped back to 1.3.12-r1 ...and copied the ebuild > over to a local overlay. I'm not liking profile 17.0 far. -- Regards, Peter.
[SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Questions about Pale Moon
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:43:31AM +, Peter Humphrey wrote > > This is with gcc 4.9.4, and I get the same with gcc 6.4.0. I've only > just noticed that about -fPIC; haven't all those problems been fixed > by now? This may or may not be relavant. I build Pale Moon manually for my home machines, using the Mozilla Firefox process. 64-bit builds worked fine with GCC-6.4.0 on profile 13.0. Anything built with GCC-6.x under profile 17.0 segfaults in 10-15 seconds after launching Pale Moon. A custom-built GCC-5.4.0 builds a stable Pale Moon. I'm currently doing a test build with GCC-6.4.0 on my 32-bit desktop, having just finished the migration to 17.0. Current ICEWM 1.4.2 (and 1.4.0) crashes out of X to a text console when I click on the menu bar at the bottom. I've dropped back to 1.3.12-r1 ...and copied the ebuild over to a local overlay. I'm not liking profile 17.0 far. -- Walter DnesI don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Questions about Pale Moon
On Wednesday, 24 January 2018 21:40:18 GMT Walter Dnes wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:43:31AM +, Peter Humphrey wrote > > > On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 18:27:21 GMT Walter Dnes wrote: > > > > Yes, I do have them both installed already. > > > > > Is this the official Pale Moon, or an unofficial build? > > > > It's www-client/palemoon-bin-27.7.1::palemoon. I don't know whether > > that's "official", because when I "layman -a palemoon" I'm told it's > > not an official overlay. Different officialdoms, I suppose. > > Disclosure... I'm a volunteer for the Pale Moon project (not an official > spokesman). Yes, I'd gathered that. Kudos to you :) > I do a contributed build for Pentium3-class machines. My idea of > "official" is obviously "from the Pale Moon website". Can you do a quick- > n-dirty install from the official tarball to check if the icon problem > happens with the official Pale Moon? This test will install into $HOME/pm > > 1) Go to http://linux.palemoon.org/download/mainline/ and download the > appropriate (32 or 64 bit) tarball for your system. > > 2) killall palemoon # Ignore error message if Pale Moon not running. > > 3) rm -rf $HOME/pm && mkdir $HOME/pm # Start from a known state > > 4) tar -C $HOME/pm -xvjf # Extract tarball > > 5) $HOME/pm/palemoon/palemoon # Launch Pale Moon > > Note; this install is self-contained. It does not splatter stuff all > over various library directories. Does the icon problem still happen > with the official tarball? 'Fraid so, and I still get those undefined-symbol errors I mentioned. > > This is with gcc 4.9.4, and I get the same with gcc 6.4.0. > > 6.3.0 builds Pale Moon OK on profile 13. I'll soon be doing the switch > over to 17 on my 32-bit desktop. You might be able to get things working > with custom flags for the Pale Moon ebuild using package.env as per... > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki//etc/portage/package.env Hmm. I'll have to put my thinking-cap on for that. Maybe tomorrow. This is what portage wants to do (I'm on profile 17.0): [ebuild N#] www-client/palemoon-27.7.1::palemoon USE="alsa dbus devtools gtk2 official-branding optimize -debug -ffmpeg (-gtk3) -jemalloc - necko-wifi -pulseaudio -shared-js -system-bzip2 -system-libevent -system- libvpx -system-libwebp -system-sqlite -system-zlib -threads -valgrind - webrtc" CPU_FLAGS_X86="sse sse2" 0 KiB -- Regards, Peter.
[SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Questions about Pale Moon
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:43:31AM +, Peter Humphrey wrote > On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 18:27:21 GMT Walter Dnes wrote: > > Yes, I do have them both installed already. > > > Is this the official Pale Moon, or an unofficial build? > > It's www-client/palemoon-bin-27.7.1::palemoon. I don't know whether > that's "official", because when I "layman -a palemoon" I'm told it's > not an official overlay. Different officialdoms, I suppose. Disclosure... I'm a volunteer for the Pale Moon project (not an official spokesman). I do a contributed build for Pentium3-class machines. My idea of "official" is obviously "from the Pale Moon website". Can you do a quick-n-dirty install from the official tarball to check if the icon problem happens with the official Pale Moon? This test will install into $HOME/pm 1) Go to http://linux.palemoon.org/download/mainline/ and download the appropriate (32 or 64 bit) tarball for your system. 2) killall palemoon # Ignore error message if Pale Moon not running. 3) rm -rf $HOME/pm && mkdir $HOME/pm # Start from a known state 4) tar -C $HOME/pm -xvjf # Extract tarball 5) $HOME/pm/palemoon/palemoon # Launch Pale Moon Note; this install is self-contained. It does not splatter stuff all over various library directories. Does the icon problem still happen with the official tarball? > This is with gcc 4.9.4, and I get the same with gcc 6.4.0. I've only just > noticed that about -fPIC; haven't all those problems been fixed by now? 6.3.0 builds Pale Moon OK on profile 13. I'll soon be doing the switch over to 17 on my 32-bit desktop. You might be able to get things working with custom flags for the Pale Moon ebuild using package.env as per... https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki//etc/portage/package.env -- Walter DnesI don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications