On Saturday, April 7, 2018, Mick wrote:
> On Friday, 6 April 2018 18:55:18 BST gevisz wrote:
>> 2018-04-06 2:10 GMT+03:00 Grant Taylor :
>
>> > I'd encourage your friend to check out the VPN capabilities built into
>> > Windows. He
On Friday, 6 April 2018 18:55:18 BST gevisz wrote:
> 2018-04-06 2:10 GMT+03:00 Grant Taylor :
> > I'd encourage your friend to check out the VPN capabilities built into
> > Windows. He may need to install / configure (R)RAS to enable the
> > features.
>
>
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Friday, 6 April 2018 00:10:00 BST Grant Taylor wrote:
>> On 04/05/2018 03:51 AM, gevisz wrote:
>> > Yes, the Host is running Windows.
>>
>> Seeing as how both the ""Host and the ""Client are running Windows, I
>> would
On 04/06/2018 04:51 PM, Mick wrote:
Domestic grade routers which offer IKEv1, typically use PSK for
authentication, not TLS certificates. The PSK is what IKE uses in
userspace to establish a secure connection with authentication between
peers for the purpose of exchanging the IPSec keys to
On Friday, 6 April 2018 19:20:09 BST Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 04/06/2018 11:58 AM, Mick wrote:
> > I think you mean IKEv2 + IPSec?
>
> I don't remember IKE involved the last time I had to manually
> set up an IPSec connection between two Windows systems (or Windows and a
> Netgear router). I
On 04/06/2018 11:58 AM, Mick wrote:
I think you mean IKEv2 + IPSec?
I don't remember IKE involved the last time I had to manually
set up an IPSec connection between two Windows systems (or Windows and a
Netgear router). I think it was /completely/ manual and PSK.
IKEv2 is used to exchange
2018-04-06 1:45 GMT+03:00 Bill Kenworthy :
> On 05/04/18 22:51, gevisz wrote:
>> 2018-04-05 16:14 GMT+03:00 Bill Kenworthy :
>>> On 05/04/18 18:28, gevisz wrote:
2018-04-05 12:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz :
> 2018-04-05 1:02 GMT+03:00 Grant
On Friday, 6 April 2018 00:10:00 BST Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 04/05/2018 03:51 AM, gevisz wrote:
> > Yes, the Host is running Windows.
>
> Seeing as how both the ""Host and the ""Client are running Windows, I
> would think seriously about trying to leverage Windows' built in VPN
> capabilities.
>
2018-04-06 2:10 GMT+03:00 Grant Taylor :
> On 04/05/2018 03:51 AM, gevisz wrote:
>>
>> Yes, the Host is running Windows.
>
>
> Seeing as how both the ""Host and the ""Client are running Windows, I would
> think seriously about trying to leverage Windows' built in
On 04/05/2018 03:51 AM, gevisz wrote:
Yes, the Host is running Windows.
Seeing as how both the ""Host and the ""Client are running Windows, I
would think seriously about trying to leverage Windows' built in VPN
capabilities.
The following things come to mind:
- (raw) IPSec - this might
On 04/05/2018 08:51 AM, gevisz wrote:
It is strange because just today I have learned that VPN server should
be set on the host with static IP visible the in Internet. Otherwise a
VPN-client has no way to connect to the VPN-server.
The static IP is not a strict requirement. It just greatly
On 05/04/18 22:51, gevisz wrote:
> 2018-04-05 16:14 GMT+03:00 Bill Kenworthy :
>> On 05/04/18 18:28, gevisz wrote:
>>> 2018-04-05 12:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz :
2018-04-05 1:02 GMT+03:00 Grant Taylor :
On 04/04/2018 02:18
2018-04-05 19:29 GMT+03:00 Grant Taylor :
> On 04/05/2018 03:51 AM, gevisz wrote:
>>
>> Yes. And the Client also has static IP. Moreover, both OR and IR have
>> static IPs from the inside. So, the Host can make a connection request to
>> the Client.
>
> With the
On 04/05/2018 03:51 AM, gevisz wrote:
Yes. And the Client also has static IP. Moreover, both OR and IR have
static IPs from the inside. So, the Host can make a connection request
to the Client.
With the client having a static IP, things become a LOT simpler. Simply
flip things around and
2018-04-05 16:14 GMT+03:00 Bill Kenworthy :
> On 05/04/18 18:28, gevisz wrote:
>> 2018-04-05 12:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz :
>>> 2018-04-05 1:02 GMT+03:00 Grant Taylor :
>>> On 04/04/2018 02:18 PM, gevisz wrote:
Assuming that
2018-04-05 14:51 GMT+03:00 Mick :
>
> Your double NAT-ing arrangement hides the host twice over from the Internet.
> In addition, some of the domestic ISP providers also offer NAT'ed connections
> for their users.
Our outer router with static IP is actually the router
On 05/04/18 18:28, gevisz wrote:
> 2018-04-05 12:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz :
>> 2018-04-05 1:02 GMT+03:00 Grant Taylor :
>> On 04/04/2018 02:18 PM, gevisz wrote:
>>> Assuming that NAT is in play on OR and IR (worst case), then just about
>>> /any/
On Thursday, 5 April 2018 11:28:07 BST gevisz wrote:
> A small correction after a call to the friend: the VPN server should
> be installed
> on the Client and the VPN client should be installed on the Host.
>
> Becaule of the same reason it is impossible to set up VPN server on the IR.
>
>
2018-04-05 12:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz :
> 2018-04-05 1:02 GMT+03:00 Grant Taylor :
> On 04/04/2018 02:18 PM, gevisz wrote:
>> Assuming that NAT is in play on OR and IR (worst case), then just about
>> /any/ form of VPN initiating from the outside
2018-04-05 2:03 GMT+03:00 Mick :
> On Wednesday, 4 April 2018 23:02:20 BST Grant Taylor wrote:
>> On 04/04/2018 02:18 PM, gevisz wrote:
>> > A friend of mine asked me to recommend him an open-source VPN-server
>> > for Linux but unfortunately I never used one.
>>
>>
2018-04-05 1:02 GMT+03:00 Grant Taylor :
> On 04/04/2018 02:18 PM, gevisz wrote:
>>
>> A friend of mine asked me to recommend him an open-source VPN-server for
>> Linux but unfortunately I never used one.
>
> That's a loaded ask.
I just tried to point to the
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:18 PM, gevisz wrote:
> A friend of mine asked me to recommend him an open-source
> VPN-server for Linux but unfortunately I never used one.
>
If not https://www.wireguard.com/, I recommend OpenVPN. You could try
to set up IPsec if you wanted.
> After
On Wednesday, 4 April 2018 23:02:20 BST Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 04/04/2018 02:18 PM, gevisz wrote:
> > A friend of mine asked me to recommend him an open-source VPN-server
> > for Linux but unfortunately I never used one.
>
> That's a loaded ask.
>
> > After some googling, I have found OpenVPN
On 04/04/2018 02:18 PM, gevisz wrote:
A friend of mine asked me to recommend him an open-source VPN-server
for Linux but unfortunately I never used one.
That's a loaded ask.
After some googling, I have found OpenVPN but do not know if it is the
best choice that suits his purposes, namely to
A friend of mine asked me to recommend him an open-source
VPN-server for Linux but unfortunately I never used one.
After some googling, I have found OpenVPN but do not know
if it is the best choice that suits his purposes, namely to access
local network that does not have its own fixed IP from
25 matches
Mail list logo