Re: [gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel = superkernel

2010-11-26 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 2010-11-25 16:37, schrieb Florian Philipp: Anyway, if you want my solution, here it is, although it's mostly copy'n'paste from the original link: [...] Hope this helps, Florian Philipp Thanks a lot for that howto, Stefan

Re: [gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel = superkernel

2010-11-25 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 23.11.2010 19:26, schrieb Florian Philipp: BTW: I've implemented a slightly adjusted version of the bash script (Ubuntu alternative) for Gentoo yesterday and I must say, I'm really impressed. Would you share?

Re: [gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel = superkernel

2010-11-25 Thread Adam Carter
Would you share? +1 I only have an empty /sys/fs/cgroup with the following config on 2.6.36, so please share the kernel config as well. # zgrep CGROUP /proc/config.gz CONFIG_CGROUPS=y # CONFIG_CGROUP_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_CGROUP_NS=y CONFIG_CGROUP_FREEZER=y CONFIG_CGROUP_DEVICE=y

Re: [gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel = superkernel

2010-11-25 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 25.11.2010 12:21, schrieb Adam Carter: Would you share? +1 I only have an empty /sys/fs/cgroup with the following config on 2.6.36, so please share the kernel config as well. I guess you have to mount your cgroup there, first. The original link describes, how. I don't have a

Re: [gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel = superkernel

2010-11-25 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 24.11.2010 22:13, schrieb Mick: On Tuesday 23 November 2010 16:42:51 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: FYI. If anyone understands the bash tweak, please explain :-) TIA 1. Original article: The ~200 Line Linux Kernel Patch That Does Wonders

Re: [gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel = superkernel

2010-11-25 Thread Sebastian Beßler
Am 25.11.2010 16:40, schrieb Florian Philipp: Am 24.11.2010 22:13, schrieb Mick: On Tuesday 23 November 2010 16:42:51 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: 2. The alternative (or additional) bash tweak: http://www.webupd8.org/2010/11/alternative-to-200-lines-kernel-patch.html The second link keeps crashing

Re: [gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel = superkernel

2010-11-24 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 23 November 2010 16:42:51 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: FYI. If anyone understands the bash tweak, please explain :-) TIA 1. Original article: The ~200 Line Linux Kernel Patch That Does Wonders http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=linux_2637_videonum=1 2. The alternative

[gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel = superkernel

2010-11-23 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
FYI. If anyone understands the bash tweak, please explain :-) TIA 1. Original article: The ~200 Line Linux Kernel Patch That Does Wonders http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=linux_2637_videonum=1 2. The alternative (or additional) bash tweak:

Re: [gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel = superkernel

2010-11-23 Thread Paul Hartman
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:42 AM, 7v5w7go9ub0o 7v5w7go9u...@gmail.com wrote: FYI. If anyone understands the bash tweak, please explain :-) TIA 1. Original article: The ~200 Line Linux Kernel Patch That Does Wonders http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=linux_2637_videonum=1 2.

Re: [gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel = superkernel

2010-11-23 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 23.11.2010 17:42, schrieb 7v5w7go9ub0o: FYI. If anyone understands the bash tweak, please explain :-) TIA 1. Original article: The ~200 Line Linux Kernel Patch That Does Wonders http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=linux_2637_videonum=1 2. The alternative (or additional)