Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 03/02/18 16:08, Dale wrote:
>> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>> It is perfectly fine to downgrade glibc if you didn't emerge anything
>>> that compiled binaries.
>>>
>>> If you did, you can still downgrade, but then you need to rebuild the
>>> packages that you emerged
On 03/02/18 16:08, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
It is perfectly fine to downgrade glibc if you didn't emerge anything
that compiled binaries.
If you did, you can still downgrade, but then you need to rebuild the
packages that you emerged since the glibc upgrade. qlop is your friend
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 03/02/18 07:54, Dale wrote:
>> While on this topic, I have a question about glibc. I have it set in
>> make.conf to save the binary packages. Generally I use it when I need
>> to go back shortly after a upgrade, usually Firefox or something.
>> However, this package
On 03/02/18 07:54, Dale wrote:
While on this topic, I have a question about glibc. I have it set in
make.conf to save the binary packages. Generally I use it when I need
to go back shortly after a upgrade, usually Firefox or something.
However, this package is different since going back a
4 matches
Mail list logo
