[gentoo-user] Re: bind-9.7.1_p2 does not want to stop...

2010-11-17 Thread walt
On 11/16/2010 04:01 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 01:20 on Wednesday 17 November 2010, walt did opine thusly: On 11/16/2010 11:47 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: ... For an auth server, powerdns is very good... By 'auth' do you mean something like DNSSEC? If not,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: bind-9.7.1_p2 does not want to stop...

2010-11-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:44 on Wednesday 17 November 2010, walt did opine thusly: On 11/16/2010 04:01 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 01:20 on Wednesday 17 November 2010, walt did opine thusly: On 11/16/2010 11:47 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: ...

[gentoo-user] Re: bind-9.7.1_p2 does not want to stop...

2010-11-16 Thread walt
On 11/16/2010 11:47 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: ... For an auth server, powerdns is very good... By 'auth' do you mean something like DNSSEC? If not, who's doing the auth-ing?

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: bind-9.7.1_p2 does not want to stop...

2010-11-16 Thread Adam Carter
On 11/16/2010 11:47 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: ... For an auth server, powerdns is very good... By 'auth' do you mean something like DNSSEC? If not, who's doing the auth-ing? He means authoritative server (ie a server that has a copy of the zone file) - not authentication.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: bind-9.7.1_p2 does not want to stop...

2010-11-16 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:20 on Wednesday 17 November 2010, walt did opine thusly: On 11/16/2010 11:47 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: ... For an auth server, powerdns is very good... By 'auth' do you mean something like DNSSEC? If not, who's doing the auth-ing? Do you