On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
Connected question: How do I quickly find all the packages that
got installed as a dependency, but which are no longer needed,
because the dependent package got removed (as an example, I'd
like to find kde-i18n, because that used to be a
Michael Schmarck wrote:
Connected question: How do I quickly find all the packages that
got installed as a dependency, but which are no longer needed,
because the dependent package got removed (as an example, I'd
like to find kde-i18n, because that used to be a dependency of
kde-meta and
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Dale wrote:
That will tell you packages that are installed and !may! not be
needed by other packages. Note all the warnings here? I have not
had anything serious removed by using this in ages but strange things
can happen. You need to be careful with this. Remove
Michael Schmarck wrote:
Thanks.
I think I removed kde-meta, because it installs too much stuff,
that I don't need (like kppp). It would be nice, if the kde-meta
ebuild would be more like the gst-plugins-meta package, in that
it sould allow the user to specify what he wants to get installed
and
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other option is to use the kde*meta ebuilds, which do directly
depend on the sub-ordinate packages. This is what I do and I don't
get the effect you observed.
Thanks.
I think I removed kde-meta,
Michael Schmarck wrote:
SNIP
Connected question: How do I quickly find all the packages that
got installed as a dependency, but which are no longer needed,
because the dependent package got removed (as an example, I'd
like to find kde-i18n, because that used to be a dependency of
kde-meta
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:30:11 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
I think I removed kde-meta, because it installs too much stuff,
that I don't need (like kppp). It would be nice, if the kde-meta
ebuild would be more like the gst-plugins-meta package, in that
it sould allow the user to specify what
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Dale wrote:
That will tell you packages that are installed and !may! not be
needed by other packages. Note all the warnings here? I have not
had anything serious removed by using this in ages but strange things
can happen. You need to be
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Dale wrote:
That will tell you packages that are installed and !may! not be
needed by other packages. Note all the warnings here? I have not
had anything serious removed by using this in ages but
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
I think you need to fix your world before before doing any
--depclean steps.
Seems like :)
Probably not now that we have the full picture though
--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Dale wrote:
I have :-)
I've also removed (forcibly) all versions of gcc, portage, and glibc
individually and all together. quickpkg is a nice thing to know
about :-)
I got that covered. I found this little tid bit of info. OP may want
11 matches
Mail list logo
