On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 00:51:32 -1000 Beau E. Cox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Can I safely emerge (different packages, non-interdependent) in
| different terminal sessions at the same time?
No.
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (King of all Londinium)
Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web
On Sunday 29 January 2006 09:59 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 00:51:32 -1000 Beau E. Cox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Can I safely emerge (different packages, non-interdependent) in
| different terminal sessions at the same time?
No.
Many have said Yes. Can you explain?
--
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:33:01 -1000 Beau E. Cox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Sunday 29 January 2006 09:59 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 00:51:32 -1000 Beau E. Cox
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | Can I safely emerge (different packages, non-interdependent) in
| | different
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:48:34 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote:
Now I have got a related question: Imagine you have got one portage
tree on one box but several boxes that NFS mount it with different
world files. Will several parallel emerge --fetchonly processes on
those different boxes still be safe?
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
the many ways in which parallel merges can still break.
Please give us one example.
Benno
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 1/30/06, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:48:34 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote: Now I have got a related question: Imagine you have got one portage tree on one box but several boxes that NFS mount it with different world files. Will several parallelemerge --fetchonly
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:24:14 +0100, Huib van Wees wrote:
Yes, because portage uses lockfiles in $DISTDIR. Once one emerge
begins downloading a file, any others wanting that file will wait for
it.
I can remember that export the portage dir for other host wasn't
supported
and can cause
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:41:37 +0100 Benno Schulenberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| the many ways in which parallel merges can still break.
|
| Please give us one example.
You install a package that runs autotools and a package that provides
an aclocal entry at the same
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 13:24 +0100, Huib van Wees wrote:
On 1/30/06, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:48:34 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote:
Now I have got a related question: Imagine you have got one
portage
tree on one box but
Beau E. Cox wrote:
Can I safely emerge (different packages, non-interdependent) in
different terminal sessions at the same time?
Yes, I do all that all the time.
Alexander Skwar
--
Espy we need to split main intocore and wtf-uses-this
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
--- Beau E. Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi -
Can I safely emerge (different packages,
non-interdependent) in
different terminal sessions at the same time?
--
Aloha = Beau;
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Yes, you can start as many sesions of emerge as you
like, even
On Sunday 29 January 2006 12:56 am, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Beau E. Cox wrote:
Can I safely emerge (different packages, non-interdependent) in
different terminal sessions at the same time?
Yes, I do all that all the time.
Alexander Skwar
--
Espy we need to split main intocore and
On Sunday 29 January 2006 01:04 am, Andrei Slavoiu wrote:
--- Beau E. Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi -
Can I safely emerge (different packages,
non-interdependent) in
different terminal sessions at the same time?
--
Aloha = Beau;
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 01:02 -1000, Beau E. Cox wrote:
On Sunday 29 January 2006 12:56 am, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Beau E. Cox wrote:
Can I safely emerge (different packages, non-interdependent) in
different terminal sessions at the same time?
Yes, I do all that all the time.
On Sunday 29 January 2006 06:53 am, Michael Sullivan wrote:
On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 01:02 -1000, Beau E. Cox wrote:
On Sunday 29 January 2006 12:56 am, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Beau E. Cox wrote:
Can I safely emerge (different packages, non-interdependent) in
different terminal sessions
Michael Sullivan wrote:
Keep in mind though that multiple emerges will share resources, so each
process may lose speed...
Something that I always wondered about - does it
actually *lose* speed? IOW: Is it, *IN* *TOTAL*
slower to do multiple emerges in parallel compared
to doing them
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Michael Sullivan wrote:
Keep in mind though that multiple emerges will share resources, so each
process may lose speed...
Something that I always wondered about - does it
actually *lose* speed? IOW: Is it, *IN* *TOTAL*
slower to do multiple emerges in parallel
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:26:41 +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Something that I always wondered about - does it
actually *lose* speed? IOW: Is it, *IN* *TOTAL*
slower to do multiple emerges in parallel compared
to doing them sequentially?
It could be faster, when one emerge is in a CPU-intensive
At Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:03:19 -0600 Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Something that I always wondered about - does it
actually *lose* speed? IOW: Is it, *IN* *TOTAL*
slower to do multiple emerges in parallel compared
to doing them sequentially?
I'm no guru for sure but here
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Something that I always wondered about - does it
actually *lose* speed? IOW: Is it, *IN* *TOTAL*
slower to do multiple emerges in parallel compared
to doing them sequentially?
I would expect the answer to this lies in how you set your MAKEOPTS.
--
On 29 January 2006 18:53, Michael Sullivan wrote:
Keep in mind though that multiple emerges will share resources, so each
process may lose speed...
True, but --fetchonly emerge can pull in sources as fast as possible while
the other emerge compiles stuff. That makes sense if you are paying
21 matches
Mail list logo
