Re: [gentoo-user] CoreOS vulnerability inherited from Gentoo?

2016-06-01 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 31 May 2016 18:44:10 +0100, Mick wrote: > > The operator user was not used by CoreOS, but existed because it > > exists in the Gentoo Portage system from which CoreOS is derived. > > > > > > Full read [1]. It kinda shows that CoreOS is derived from Gentoo > > and not ChromeOS; at least

Re: [gentoo-user] CoreOS vulnerability inherited from Gentoo?

2016-05-31 Thread Max R.D. Parmer
On Tue, May 31, 2016, at 11:07, Max R.D. Parmer wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016, at 10:44, Mick wrote: > > On Tuesday 31 May 2016 16:30:27 James wrote: > > > Here is an interesting read:: > > > > > > Security brief: CoreOS Linux Alpha remote SSH issue > > > May 19, 2016 · By Matthew Garrett > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] CoreOS vulnerability inherited from Gentoo?

2016-05-31 Thread Max R.D. Parmer
On Tue, May 31, 2016, at 10:44, Mick wrote: > On Tuesday 31 May 2016 16:30:27 James wrote: > > Here is an interesting read:: > > > > Security brief: CoreOS Linux Alpha remote SSH issue > > May 19, 2016 · By Matthew Garrett > > > > > > > > Gentoo defaults to ending the PAM configuration with

Re: [gentoo-user] CoreOS vulnerability inherited from Gentoo?

2016-05-31 Thread Michael Cook
On 05/31/2016 01:44 PM, Mick wrote: On Tuesday 31 May 2016 16:30:27 James wrote: Here is an interesting read:: Security brief: CoreOS Linux Alpha remote SSH issue May 19, 2016 · By Matthew Garrett Gentoo defaults to ending the PAM configuration with an optional pam_permit. This meant that

Re: [gentoo-user] CoreOS vulnerability inherited from Gentoo?

2016-05-31 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 31 May 2016 16:30:27 James wrote: > Here is an interesting read:: > > Security brief: CoreOS Linux Alpha remote SSH issue > May 19, 2016 · By Matthew Garrett > > > > Gentoo defaults to ending the PAM configuration with an optional pam_permit. > > This meant that failing both