Re: [gentoo-user] Excessive processor usage

2007-08-07 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Montag, 6. August 2007, Neil Bothwick wrote:
 On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 10:49:01 -0400, sean wrote:
  Hans, Xav, Thank You both, ran the root kit check no problems.

 Which may not prove much. Rootkit detectors (I prefer rkhunter BTW) are
 most effective when installed before a computer is open to infection. If
 you install it on a machine that has already been rootkitted, the rootkit
 may be able to conceal itself.

can we stop the scare tactics now?

Or are you sure that YOUR box is rootkit free? And the install cd? Or every 
other install medium?

Why scaring him?

Probably is problem is disk access+dma off.
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Excessive processor usage

2007-08-07 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 09:19:40 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:

   Hans, Xav, Thank You both, ran the root kit check no problems.  
 
  Which may not prove much. Rootkit detectors (I prefer rkhunter BTW)
  are most effective when installed before a computer is open to
  infection. If you install it on a machine that has already been
  rootkitted, the rootkit may be able to conceal itself.  
 
 can we stop the scare tactics now?

It is only a scare tactic if the intent is to frighten, not to inform.

 Or are you sure that YOUR box is rootkit free? And the install cd? Or
 every other install medium?

As sure as I can be, but I do not blindly assume hat everything is OK
because one program, possibly using compromised information, says so.

 Why scaring him?

See above.

 Probably is problem is disk access+dma off.

I agree, heavy disk I/O can cause major slowdowns, but if someone is
considering a rootkit infection, they should at least be aware of the
facts when looking for it.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

You are about to give someone a piece of your mind,
something you can ill afford...


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Excessive processor usage

2007-08-07 Thread Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Neil Bothwick wrote:
 I agree, heavy disk I/O can cause major slowdowns, but if someone is
 considering a rootkit infection, they should at least be aware of the
 facts when looking for it.

I agree. Let's add some data to the thread:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rootkit
http://www.net-security.org/dl/articles/Detecting_and_Understanding_rootkits.txt

nmap your server from outside, full port range tcp, udp. (ok, lots of rootkits 
still use OOB, IGMP,
ICMP, etc for control and data transport). Can you boot from a livecd and run 
rkhunter AND
chkrootkit from it? Do it. If you need off-list help, contact me.

- --
Arturo Buanzo Busleiman - Consultor Independiente en Seguridad Informatica
SHOW DE FUTURABANDA - Sabado 18 de Agosto 2007 (Speed King, Capital Federal)
Entradas anticipadas a traves de www.futurabanda.com.ar - Punk Rock Melodico


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGuFhqAlpOsGhXcE0RCohGAKCDNEEdp5VyftUmjNwSJzxR4VV1MQCeJthp
cC2LijA7WV9hTjYnbsocbVw=
=ufZS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Excessive processor usage

2007-08-06 Thread Xav'
sean a écrit :
 There seems to be a lot of excessive processor usage and I am trying to
 track down why.
 
 Is anyone able to recommend the best way to track down what is causing
 the excess processor usage?
 
 I have not noticed anything using top.
So how do you know there is an excessive processor usage ? Could you describe
more precisely what you want to mean ?
 
 Thanks
 Sean
 

Regards,
Xavier Parizet

--
http://www.linuxant.fr



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Excessive processor usage

2007-08-06 Thread Abraham Marín Pérez

sean escribió:
There seems to be a lot of excessive processor usage and I am trying 
to track down why.


Is anyone able to recommend the best way to track down what is causing 
the excess processor usage?


I have not noticed anything using top.

Thanks
Sean


If top doesn't show up anything only two things come to my mind:

1) There's no excess processor usage
2) Someone compromised your system and maybe added an application that 
is using you cpu, but also changed top so it doesn't show this new 
application (might seem paranoid, but I've seen it before).


Abraham

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Excessive processor usage

2007-08-06 Thread Duane Griffin
On 06/08/07, sean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 There seems to be a lot of excessive processor usage and I am trying to
 track down why.

 Is anyone able to recommend the best way to track down what is causing
 the excess processor usage?

 I have not noticed anything using top.

You might want to look at sysstat for tracking system load:
app-admin/sysstat

Oprofile will track down exactly what is happening on your box (modulo
particularly clever root-kits). It requires kernel support and can be
a bit daunting, but is very powerful:
dev-util/oprofile

 Thanks
 Sean

Cheers,
Duane.

-- 
I never could learn to drink that blood and call it wine - Bob Dylan
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Excessive processor usage

2007-08-06 Thread Xav'
Abraham Marín Pérez a écrit :
 sean escribió:
 There seems to be a lot of excessive processor usage and I am trying
 to track down why.

 Is anyone able to recommend the best way to track down what is causing
 the excess processor usage?

 I have not noticed anything using top.

 Thanks
 Sean

 If top doesn't show up anything only two things come to my mind:
 
 1) There's no excess processor usage
 2) Someone compromised your system and maybe added an application that
 is using you cpu, but also changed top so it doesn't show this new
 application (might seem paranoid, but I've seen it before).
 
 Abraham
 
If you want to check there is no such program on your system, I advice you to
try chkrootkit, to check there is no such rootkit on your system...

Regards,
Xavier Parizet

--
http://www.linuxant.fr



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Excessive processor usage

2007-08-06 Thread sean

Xav' wrote:


So how do you know there is an excessive processor usage ? Could you describe
more precisely what you want to mean ?


Have gkrellm2 monitoring CPU usage and often for varied lengths of time 
will see a long and increased processor usage, this usually occurs on CPU1.

Things get a bit sluggish when this happens. This is a recent problem.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Excessive processor usage

2007-08-06 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Montag, 6. August 2007, sean wrote:
 Xav' wrote:
  So how do you know there is an excessive processor usage ? Could you
  describe more precisely what you want to mean ?

 Have gkrellm2 monitoring CPU usage and often for varied lengths of time
 will see a long and increased processor usage, this usually occurs on CPU1.
 Things get a bit sluggish when this happens. This is a recent problem.

I suspect IO. Disk IO makes everything slow. Especially if swap is involved.
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Excessive processor usage

2007-08-06 Thread Hans-Werner Hilse
Hi,

On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:30:01 +0200 Xav' [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If you want to check there is no such program on your system, I
 advice you to try chkrootkit, to check there is no such rootkit on
 your system...

To put it correctly, since there is _NO_ way to assure that there isn't
a rootkit:

chkrootkit can be used to check whether there _are_ _known_ rootkits.

BTW, there are other, similar programs that do the same.
But my point is: You can never be sure, since a hypothesis can't be
proven correct, just invalid.

If there are indications a rootkit might be present, there's no secure
way to remove it but to reinstall.

-hwh
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Excessive processor usage

2007-08-06 Thread sean

Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:

On Montag, 6. August 2007, sean wrote:

Xav' wrote:

So how do you know there is an excessive processor usage ? Could you
describe more precisely what you want to mean ?

Have gkrellm2 monitoring CPU usage and often for varied lengths of time
will see a long and increased processor usage, this usually occurs on CPU1.
Things get a bit sluggish when this happens. This is a recent problem.


I suspect IO. Disk IO makes everything slow. Especially if swap is involved.


Thanks Volker,

I will have to look this one over carefully.


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Excessive processor usage

2007-08-06 Thread sean

Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:

Hi,

On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:30:01 +0200 Xav' [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


If you want to check there is no such program on your system, I
advice you to try chkrootkit, to check there is no such rootkit on
your system...


To put it correctly, since there is _NO_ way to assure that there isn't
a rootkit:

chkrootkit can be used to check whether there _are_ _known_ rootkits.

BTW, there are other, similar programs that do the same.
But my point is: You can never be sure, since a hypothesis can't be
proven correct, just invalid.

If there are indications a rootkit might be present, there's no secure
way to remove it but to reinstall.

-hwh



Hans, Xav, Thank You both, ran the root kit check no problems.


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Excessive processor usage

2007-08-06 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 10:49:01 -0400, sean wrote:

 Hans, Xav, Thank You both, ran the root kit check no problems.

Which may not prove much. Rootkit detectors (I prefer rkhunter BTW) are
most effective when installed before a computer is open to infection. If
you install it on a machine that has already been rootkitted, the rootkit
may be able to conceal itself.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Excuse for the day: daemons did it


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Excessive processor usage

2007-08-06 Thread Uwe Thiem
On 06 August 2007, sean wrote:
 Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
  Hi,
 
  On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:30:01 +0200 Xav' [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  If you want to check there is no such program on your system, I
  advice you to try chkrootkit, to check there is no such rootkit on
  your system...
 
  To put it correctly, since there is _NO_ way to assure that there isn't
  a rootkit:
 
  chkrootkit can be used to check whether there _are_ _known_ rootkits.
 
  BTW, there are other, similar programs that do the same.
  But my point is: You can never be sure, since a hypothesis can't be
  proven correct, just invalid.
 
  If there are indications a rootkit might be present, there's no secure
  way to remove it but to reinstall.
 
  -hwh

 Hans, Xav, Thank You both, ran the root kit check no problems.

The problems remain: You can't be sure. :-(

Uwe

-- 
Jack Nicholson: My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son of a bitch.
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Excessive processor usage

2007-08-06 Thread Paul
so there is always an assumption

On 8/6/07, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 06 August 2007, sean wrote:
  Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
   Hi,
  
   On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:30:01 +0200 Xav' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
   If you want to check there is no such program on your system, I
   advice you to try chkrootkit, to check there is no such rootkit on
   your system...
  
   To put it correctly, since there is _NO_ way to assure that there
 isn't
   a rootkit:
  
   chkrootkit can be used to check whether there _are_ _known_ rootkits.
  
   BTW, there are other, similar programs that do the same.
   But my point is: You can never be sure, since a hypothesis can't be
   proven correct, just invalid.
  
   If there are indications a rootkit might be present, there's no secure
   way to remove it but to reinstall.
  
   -hwh
 
  Hans, Xav, Thank You both, ran the root kit check no problems.

 The problems remain: You can't be sure. :-(

 Uwe

 --
 Jack Nicholson: My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son of a
 bitch.
 --
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list




-- 
   /
  /
  \ O  /
   \/_(
.__  /   \
  __\/ )
./ (