On 02/12 11:31, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> wrote:
>
> > On 02/09 10:02, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > > Am Sonntag, 4. Februar 2018, 15:03:28 CET schrieb tu...@posteo.de:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I still have the problem of failed builds due to an
> > > > 'undefined reference
wrote:
> On 02/09 10:02, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 4. Februar 2018, 15:03:28 CET schrieb tu...@posteo.de:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I still have the problem of failed builds due to an
> > > 'undefined reference to `__alloca''. I recompiled
> > > gcc/glibc and I am
Am Samstag, 10. Februar 2018, 03:39:04 CET schrieb tu...@posteo.de:
>
> > What's your sys-libs/glibc ?!
>
> [I] sys-libs/glibc
> Installed versions: (2.2)^s(09:54:43 AM 02/04/2018)
Heh, guessed so. Welcome to the wonderful world of early testing.
It will take some time until the rest of
On 02/09 10:02, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 4. Februar 2018, 15:03:28 CET schrieb tu...@posteo.de:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I still have the problem of failed builds due to an
> > 'undefined reference to `__alloca''. I recompiled
> > gcc/glibc and I am using linux-4.15.1 (from kernel.org)
> >
Am Sonntag, 4. Februar 2018, 15:03:28 CET schrieb tu...@posteo.de:
> Hi,
>
> I still have the problem of failed builds due to an
> 'undefined reference to `__alloca''. I recompiled
> gcc/glibc and I am using linux-4.15.1 (from kernel.org)
> with linux-headers 4.15. .
>
> Affected are (at least)
5 matches
Mail list logo