Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2

2009-11-11 Thread Mick
2009/11/11 Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com: On Mittwoch 11 November 2009, Walter Dnes wrote:   Programmers all seem to have gaming rigs.  It's been a struggle to keep hal and dbus off my machines.  And I was unhappy when Firefox put SQLite in as a hard dependancy.  I think

Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2

2009-11-10 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 07:44:14 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: this has been discussed to death. Why don't you use google? amarok has a hard dependency on mysql. There is nothing you can do about it with useflags. The amarok devs have explained that several times. (sqlite too slow

Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2

2009-11-10 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:10:03 +, Mick wrote: Thanks Volker, I remember it being discussed, but didn't recall that mysql is a must - I thought that the USE flags could still offer a way out. Amarok 2 does not have a mysql USE flag. -- Neil Bothwick What's this script doing? unzip ;

Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2

2009-11-10 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 10:57:51 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:10:03 +, Mick wrote: Thanks Volker, I remember it being discussed, but didn't recall that mysql is a must - I thought that the USE flags could still offer a way out. Amarok 2 does not have a mysql USE

Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2

2009-11-10 Thread Dale
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: this has been discussed to death. Why don't you use google? amarok has a hard dependency on mysql. There is nothing you can do about it with useflags. The amarok devs have explained that several times. (sqlite too slow with big collections, no way to share

Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2

2009-11-10 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Dienstag 10 November 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Tuesday 10 November 2009 10:57:51 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:10:03 +, Mick wrote: Thanks Volker, I remember it being discussed, but didn't recall that mysql is a must - I thought that the USE flags could still

Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2

2009-11-10 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:26:33 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: amarok works great here. Everything works great somewhere, even Windows :P -- Neil Bothwick Picard: 'What do the sensors say Mr Data?' Data: 'They tell us that we can't say F*ck Sir. Picard: 'I meant the ship's sensors Mr

Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2

2009-11-10 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Dienstag 10 November 2009, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:26:33 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: amarok works great here. Everything works great somewhere, even Windows :P seroiously, what does not work great with amarok? it compiles, it installes, it scans my

Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2

2009-11-10 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 13:34:08 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Dienstag 10 November 2009, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:26:33 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: amarok works great here. Everything works great somewhere, even Windows :P seroiously, what does not work

Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2

2009-11-10 Thread Nagatoro
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 13.14.13 Alan McKinnon wrote: [...] *** glibc detected *** amarok: free(): invalid pointer: 0x03295080 *** This is a highly debated issue, glibc has new checks for various things and it seems like some think the checks are to strict or even wrong while

Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2

2009-11-10 Thread Alex Schuster
Volker Armin Hemmann writes: On Dienstag 10 November 2009, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:26:33 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: amarok works great here. Everything works great somewhere, even Windows :P seroiously, what does not work great with amarok? it compiles, it

Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2

2009-11-10 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 14:27:26 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Dienstag 10 November 2009, you wrote: On Tuesday 10 November 2009 13:34:08 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Dienstag 10 November 2009, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:26:33 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:

Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2

2009-11-10 Thread Erik
Nagatoro skrev: On Tuesday 10 November 2009 13.14.13 Alan McKinnon wrote: [...] *** glibc detected *** amarok: free(): invalid pointer: 0x03295080 *** This is a highly debated issue, glibc has new checks for various things and it seems like some think the checks are to

Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2

2009-11-10 Thread Walter Dnes
Programmers all seem to have gaming rigs. It's been a struggle to keep hal and dbus off my machines. And I was unhappy when Firefox put SQLite in as a hard dependancy. I think you'll simply have to give up on KDE and its applications. -- Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org

Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2

2009-11-10 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Mittwoch 11 November 2009, Walter Dnes wrote: Programmers all seem to have gaming rigs. It's been a struggle to keep hal and dbus off my machines. And I was unhappy when Firefox put SQLite in as a hard dependancy. I think you'll simply have to give up on KDE and its applications.

Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2

2009-11-09 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
this has been discussed to death. Why don't you use google? amarok has a hard dependency on mysql. There is nothing you can do about it with useflags. The amarok devs have explained that several times. (sqlite too slow with big collections, no way to share collections, too much work to