Re: [gentoo-user] progress everywhere !

2008-10-21 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:52:24 -0400, Philip Webb wrote: Thanks: Xulrunner is a big pkg in itself, but it seems unavoidable. It is entirely avoidable, by setting USE=-nsplugins. If you want to view documents in Firefox, you would already have xulrunner installed, so there's no problem there

Re: [gentoo-user] progress everywhere !

2008-10-20 Thread Walter Dnes
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 07:58:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote It's an office suite - I use it mostly to read documents other people send me, and because antiword is a little too minimal. I'm happy with abiword for word processing and gnumeric for spreadsheet stuff. -- Walter Dnes [EMAIL

Re: [gentoo-user] progress everywhere !

2008-10-20 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Monday 20 October 2008 12:26:11 Erik Hahn wrote: On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 07:58:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: For probably the first time ever, I just had a look at that. And I'm asking myself - why does OOo have nsplugins support at all? It's an office suite - I use it mostly to

Re: [gentoo-user] progress everywhere !

2008-10-20 Thread Erik Hahn
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 07:58:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: For probably the first time ever, I just had a look at that. And I'm asking myself - why does OOo have nsplugins support at all? It's an office suite - I use it mostly to read documents other people send me, and because

Re: [gentoo-user] progress everywhere !

2008-10-20 Thread Erik Hahn
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:35:00PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Monday 20 October 2008 12:26:11 Erik Hahn wrote: On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 07:58:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: For probably the first time ever, I just had a look at that. And I'm asking myself - why does OOo have

Re: [gentoo-user] progress everywhere !

2008-10-19 Thread Philip Webb
081019 Philip Webb wrote: OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine, but needed 5,3 MB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware). Sorry, that's = 5,3 GB ... (red face) -- ,, SUPPORT

Re: [gentoo-user] progress everywhere !

2008-10-19 Thread Dale
Philip Webb wrote: 081019 Philip Webb wrote: OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine, but needed 5,3 MB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware). Sorry, that's = 5,3 GB ... (red face) Don't worry, we knew that was a boo boo. OOo

Re: [gentoo-user] progress everywhere !

2008-10-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote: OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine, but needed 5,3 MB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware). It opened my usual spreadsheets word-processing files correctly, but the toolbar needs

Re: [gentoo-user] progress everywhere !

2008-10-19 Thread luis jure
on 2008-10-19 at 01:25 Philip Webb wrote: Dillo 2.0 has been announced: well, _that_ is good news. visiting the dillo home page (http://www.dillo.org/) i see that dillo 2.0 has been released, and there's even something about 2.1 in the changelog. would it be too difficult to update the ebuild?

Re: [gentoo-user] progress everywhere !

2008-10-19 Thread Philip Webb
081019 Alan McKinnon wrote: On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote: Does anyone know why it wants 'xulrunner', which is not a use flag here ? It's this [details snipped: thanks]: So basically it is dependant on the nsplugin USE flag and will look for xulrunner or seamonkey to

Re: [gentoo-user] progress everywhere !

2008-10-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Sunday 19 October 2008 18:52:24 Philip Webb wrote: 081019 Alan McKinnon wrote: On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote: Does anyone know why it wants 'xulrunner', which is not a use flag here ? It's this [details snipped: thanks]: So basically it is dependant on the

Re: [gentoo-user] progress everywhere !

2008-10-19 Thread KH
Philip Webb schrieb: 081019 Philip Webb wrote: OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine, but needed 5,3 MB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware). Sorry, that's = 5,3 GB ... (red face) Thanks for that info. Than I will have to build