Oliver and Mike:
I'm a climate change agnostic, and am openly supportive of Geo-Nurtring,
including activities such as solar radiation management and rebalancing the
carbon cycle, which would surely include energy conservation.
The problem I have faced comes when someone like Prof. Jagadish Shukl
Dear David--
I¹ll be in California at time of Lindzen¹s talk‹you can read my take on at
least some of Lindzen¹s positions at
http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/index.php/csw/details/maccracken_on_lindz
en/.
And I¹ll let you ask Lindzen if he agrees that clouds create an uncertainty
of 100 C on
I AGREE:
THIS IS NOT THE APPROPRIATE GROUP IN WHICH TO DISCUSS THE REALITY OF HUMAN
INFLUENCE ON CLIMATE.
THIS IS A FINE DISCUSSION FOR ANOTHER GROUP, BUT MERELY A DISTRACTION HERE.
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Oliver Wingenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> Dear David,
>
> The prudent an
Dear David,
The prudent and conservative to do is to be cautious and try and
maintain the status quo, which is our present climate or one not too
long ago. It does know one in this country (well a lawyer could argue
against this) any harm to conserve energy. It helps them personally,
the countr
Hi David‹Well, I read the article‹what a lot of nonsense. Aside from little
errors like not doing the math of the CO2 projection right to 2050 and not
understanding how the greenhouse effect works, to major problems (as a
start):
1. The 2 plus 2 = 5 explanation of systematic errors is really flawe
