What’s next – Acidgate? -Greg

http://boss.hawaiireporter.com/ocean-acidification-is-a-misnomer/
Ocean Acidification is a Misnomer
BY JACK DINI–A good way to excite people is to tell them that something is 
becoming more ‘acid,’ as ‘the oceans are undergoing acidification and this is a 
potential environmental catastrophe.’
The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the leading proponent 
of the doom of global warming, states that the mean pH of surface waters ranges 
between 7.9 and 8.3 in the open oceans, so the oceans remain alkaline. It is 
dishonest to present to a lay audience that any perceived reduction in 
alkalinity means the oceans are turning to acid. (1) Since the pH of the oceans 
is higher than neutral (pH = 7), this means the oceans are alkaline. The pH 
scale ranges from 0 to 14; pH 6 is ten times more acid than pH 7 and pH 5 is a 
hundred times more acid than pH 7. (2)
Unfortunately, as Scientific American points out, ‘acidification’ means a drop 
in value, anywhere along the scale. (3) So the term ‘ocean acidification’ is 
misleading. The oceans are not acidifying. They are undergoing a process known 
as neutralization, but the term ‘acidification’ sounds scarier than talking 
about the oceans becoming slightly less basic or a little more neutral.
At least one university is equating seawater with vinegar in an on-line 
presentation for schools. Vinegar (acetic acid) has a pH of 2.5, almost a 
million times more acidic in terms of hydrogen ion activity than seawater. This 
is deliberate disinformation to present to young people. (1)
What about pH variation?
The Economist talks about pH measurements in Hawaii; “The pH difference from 
one year to the next is frequently greater than the change in average pH levels 
over 20 years. All of this suggests that the effects will be far from uniform.” 
(4)
Chris Jury, Center for Marine Science, Biology and Marine Biology, University 
of North Carolina, reports, “On some reef flats pH values have been measured to 
vary from as low as 7.8 to as high as 8.4 in a single 24 hour period. In some 
lagoons, pH has been measured to vary as much as 1 pH unit in a day (e.g., 7.6 
to 8.6). (5)
USF researchers raised a warning flag upon finding that upper-ocean pH had, 
over the preceding one-and-a-half decades, decreased by approximately 0.026 
units, equivalent to an average annual pH change of -0.0017, over a large 
section of the northeastern Pacific. “The pH decrease is direct evidence for 
ocean acidification,” said Richard Feely. “These dramatic changes can be 
attributed, in most part, to anthropogenic CO2 uptake by the ocean over a 15 
year period.” (1) Pretty hefty words for a pH change of 0.0017 per year. Have 
you ever tried to measure pH? How do you get a value as low as 0.0017?
What about the effects on corals and various species?
“Experiments with seawater are flawed because they are done in laboratories 
removed from the ocean floor rocks, sedimentation from continents and flow of 
river waters into the oceans. It is these real processes that have kept the 
oceans alkaline for billions of years. Laboratory experiments have to provide 
results in a short time to be reported in scientific journals. Processes over 
geological time cannot be that easily replicated. Computer simulations that 
ignore observations and natural processes that have taken place over billions 
of years end up with a result unrelated to reality. Reality is written in 
rocks, not models based on incomplete information,” notes Ian Plimer. (6)
Proof of this statement can be found in a recent Scientific American article by 
Marah Hardt and Carl Safina, “If small pH changes occurred gradually over tens 
of thousands of years, a species might evolve adaptations, for example, by 
retaining chance genetic mutations that result in greater production of buffer 
molecules. But species generally cannot adapt to changes occurring over mere 
hundreds of years or less. Similar changes produced in the lab over days to 
weeks are lethal.” (3) There it is; short time experiments are lethal. Lab 
experiments persist for weeks to months. Climate change occurs over decades and 
centuries. We have no way of predicting how species will adapt over long 
periods of time.
There are many contrary peer reviewed papers challenging the claims about the 
impact of CO2 on the oceans. One survey highlights some one hundred and fifty 
such papers, most of them showing that we cannot possibly acidify the oceans. 
(1)
Iris Hendriks of the Mediterranean Institute for Advanced Studies recently 
analyzed data from a wide sample of research into how individual organisms 
respond to increased carbon dioxide in their seawater. She found that the range 
of responses was wide, with some seeming to prefer the lowered pH. She also 
found that the effects to be expected in the 21st century were, on average, 
comparatively modest. (4)
Recent research published by Elisabetta Erba in Science says corals are not 
threatened by lower pH. The study contradicts the assumption that ocean 
acidification leads to species die-offs, surprising scientists. (7)
Hugo Loaiciga and colleagues report in Geophysical Research Letters that a 
doubling of CO2 from 380 ppm to 760 ppm would increase the seawater acidity 
approximately 0.19 units (e.g., from a pH of 8.2 to 8.0). This paper’s result 
concerning average seawater salinity and acidity shows that on a global scale 
and over the time scale of hundreds of years, there would not be accentuated 
changes in either seawater salinity or acidity. (8)
What To Do?
Here’s the suggestion from Hardt and Safina, “The EPA should move forward with 
including CO2 as a pollutant under the Clean Water Act, giving states the 
authority to enforce CO2 emissions limits. Establishing marine protected areas 
would allow species to recover from overexploitation; higher numbers would give 
their populations and gene pools more resilience in responding to climate 
changes.” (3) Sounds great, but what about the 80% of the world’s people who 
want to catch up to us. We can’t make any durable dent in global emissions 
because emissions from the developing world are growing too fast. Any proposed 
CO2 controls would increase production costs while giving a ‘free pass’ to 
underdeveloped countries. Guess were the most energy intensive industries will 
relocate? To the lowest cost producers who will not have to worry about 
controlling emissions.
The bottom line on pH measurement is that to pretend there is an accurate 
long-term record of pH over the oceans—or that a single reading from Hawaii or 
anywhere else is typical of all oceans—is nonsense. The simple answer is we 
don’t know. But what we do know is that in the past, creatures in the ocean 
have survived and thrived under conditions that were less alkaline than those 
existing right now. (4)
References
1. Dennis Ambler, “Acid Seas- Back to Basic,”, SPPI Original Paper, February 
11, 2010
2. Ian Plimer, Heaven and Earth, (New York, Taylor Trade Publishing, 2009), 331
3. Marah J. Hardt and Carl Safina, “Threatening Ocean Life From the Inside 
Out,” Scientific American, 303, 66, August 2010
4. “The other carbon-dioxide problem,” The Economist, July 1, 2010
5. Chris Jury, “Aquarium Chemistry: The Carbonate System in the Aquarium, and 
the Ocean, Part I: The Components of the Carbonate System,” 
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2008/12/chemistry/view?searchterm=.
6. Ian Plimer, Heaven and Earth, 338
7. Elisabetta Erba, et al., “Calcareous Nannoplankton Response to Surface-Water 
Acidification Around Oceanic Anoxic Event 1a,” Science, 329, 428, July 23, 2010
8. Hugo A Loaiciga, et al., “Modern-age buildup of CO2 and its effect on 
seawater acidity and salinity,” Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L10605, 
i:10.1029/2006GL026305
Jack Dini is a resident of Livermore, CA

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineer...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to