Hi
Thanks for the +ve reception to my comments.
@Mike: Sometimes numeric analysis is the best way to investigate, and
sometimes it's not. I don't think that the relatively simplistic numerical
analysis you suggest gets us much further. Let me propose a 'thought
experiment' instead. Imagine
Hi Andrew‹I¹ll agree that if one were to do extensive bubble coverage
consistently in a biologically active area that there could well be
problems. So, if done in a power plat cooling pond that is also a fish
habitat or something, it might be a worry. However, if done spread over the
ocean and in
Hi,
I wonder is anyone working on climate mitigation through active
intervention (SRM or CDR) to input into the Rio plus 20 Earth Summit in
2012?
It might be an interesting opportunity.
many thanks,
Emily.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Andrew (with ccs)
Again, thanks. Today, mostly commenting only on your remarks back to me - with
which I mostly agree. No new topics.
But first, I worry that a description of driving through dense fog may mislead
some readers not familiar with the Bright Water concept. I hope you agree
that
