List (plus three) 

The following are three more recent additions to the "Bright Water" dialog from 
two of the more active contributing, but non-Geoengineering list members. I 
believe all others who have already commented on this topic are list-members. 
Others who should be alerted will hopefully have this forwarded to them at some 
appropriate time . 

It seems that the dialog is going well and testing might proceed even if Ken's 
funding might fall through (and I hope it won't) Anyone know of a plausible 
different source of test funding? 

The right team seems to be assembling. 

Ron 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Thomas Goreau" <gor...@bestweb.net> 
To: "Russell Seitz" <russellse...@gmail.com> 
Cc: "Per Resen Steenstrup" <p...@resen.dk>, "rongretlar...@comcast.net Larson" 
<rongretlar...@comcast.net> 
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 10:35:37 AM 
Subject: Re: Ring of Bright Water? 

Yes, that's absolutely right, not only does it get hottest when the water is 
calmest, but also light stress exacerbates temperature stress. The question is 
if you can power the equipment needed from the kind of output you get. The wave 
generator can make either AC or DC power depending on the generator used, and 
can have higher energy output per unit area. 





On Apr 21, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Russell Seitz wrote: 


Because cooling reefs means making bubbles when the sun shines high, solar 
power cell power output curves are almost perfectly matched to hydrosol pumping 
needs. Coral bleaching is in large measure a fair weather problem 


On 21 April 2011 11:47, Thomas Goreau < gor...@bestweb.net > wrote: 



Dear Ron, 


Thanks! I'm replying to all but will get bounced from the Geoengineering list 
as I'm not a member. 


A couple very quick comments. 


I developed the method for accurately predicting coral bleaching from satellite 
data some 22 years ago, and since then we have lost most of the coral to high 
temperatures (note that we have not yet lost the dead reef structures, those 
take longer to fall apart, but they will because the living corals that build 
and repair them are largely gone, and most people fail to make this critical 
distinction). We have also long shown that coral reefs are the most climate 
sensitive ecosystem and will be the first to vanish, along with the major 
biodiversity, fisheries, tourism, sand, and shore protection for over 100 
countries. 


I'm certainly ready to work on testing any serious hope to save them. I've 
dived longer and in more places than any coral scientist, and have the world's 
largest underwater photo collection from the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s (taken by 
my grandfather and father) so I have a pretty good idea of how they used to be 
pretty much everywhere. 


But I think Russell can confirm that the key is making microbubbles, and also 
finding a way to stabilize them. That may not be so easy with photovoltaics as 
it may require special pumps and bubbling apparatus? He knows infinitely more 
about this. 


Also a better way to power such projects may be using wave power generators. 
I'm working closely with a Danish group that is about to release a new 
generation of small, simple wave generators that can make up to a kilowatt per 
square meter in waves only 5-10 cm high. That will allow power to be made in 
most places most of the time, although it won't work in flat calm periods. 
However use of batteries to store night time generated energy could provide a 
buffer over calm periods. I'm including Per Resen Steenstrup from the wave 
generator group on the cc list (sorry Per, you'll need to read the thread below 
to see where this is coming from). 


Best wishes, 
Tom 







On Apr 21, 2011, at 11:14 AM, rongretlar...@comcast.net wrote: 




Oliver, Russell, Tom etal (and adding the Geoegineering list and Ken) 

[Note to new cc additions. There has been some off-list discussion as indicated 
by the addressee list to which I am responding.. In part, this is an attempt to 
bring that dialog on-list. Apologies for a few cross-listings.]. 

<snip a lot that was sent earlier today to everyone receiving this> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to