Jim
Thanks for your email.
Could you cite emails where you think there have been ad hominem attacks on
ETC?
I'm reluctant to censor obvious satire. This thread has triggered useful
debate.
I'm also concerned at your attempts to apply the ad hominem principle to a
group or organisation. This
Teaser piece on Keith paper
http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2012/10/22/solar-geoengineering-climate-change/
Solar Geoengineering Holds Promise for Addressing Climate Change
By MELODY Y. GUAN, CONTRIBUTING WRITER
Published: Monday, October 22, 2012
Stopping or reversing climate change can be
For the record I agree (particularly on basis that they see this as Haida
waters, that evidence from eruption plumes points to salmon benefit.
On Monday, October 22, 2012, Bhaskar M V bhaskarmv...@gmail.com wrote:
Haida Salmon Restoration Project
Legal issues -
The media advisory released by
I still think we need to focus on the fact that the public do find geoengineers
a viable community deserving the support. We should not be distracted by the
negative lobby groups like ETC because the public realises that the real
problem in quantitative terms is the pollution we put out, not
HTTP://WWW.EENEWS.NET/GREENWIRE/PRINT/2012/10/22/9
OCEANS:
Canadian village defends Pacific iron ore dumping
Published: Monday, October 22, 2012
Leaders of a small Canadian village on Friday defended the dumping of 120 tons
of iron ore into the Pacific Ocean, saying it was a legal experiment to
After I read Geopiracy: The Case Against
Geoengineeringhttp://www.etcgroup.org/content/geopiracy-case-against-geoengineering
on the ETC website, I, mistakenly as I see now, concluded that ETC couldn't
possibly be serious. I thought their contribution was aimed at provoking
laughter. Hence,
As many of you know, Jennifer Francis has published interesting research
in GRL recently regarding the amplified warming in the Arctic and how
this may affect the jet stream; see
[1] http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2012/2012GL051000.shtml
[2] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4spEuh8vswE
[3]
We do not choose to focus on problems based on an objective appraisal of
threats posed, but rather largely based on which actions we find to be most
ethically repugnant. Apparently, dumping raw sewage simply to save the cost of
sewage processing is less repugnant than fertilizing the ocean in
(Full abstract wouldnt copy from page)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095758201200119X?v=s5
Williamson, Phillip; et al. (2012): Ocean fertilization for geoengineering:
a review of effectiveness, environmental impacts and emerging governance
Williamson, Phillip; Wallace,
