The paper linked below has detailed costings for various methods of
injection. It's been out for a while, but I'm not sure it's received full
attention. These estimates conflict with those in the Aurora report, which
has perhaps received more attention.
Dear Nathan,
I would sleep better at night if one government in the world was
preparing to lead the battle to save the sea ice and prevent Arctic
meltdown. While governments are being told that there is no immediate
requirement for geoengineering and they should focus entirely on
emissions
The appropriate rejoinder is often Compared to what?
For example, What if the application is not spatially uniform? Uneven
application results in uneven cooling, therefore pressure differences,
therefore new winds are generated. Assuming spatially homogenous effects
glosses over all that
-- Forwarded message --
From: Maas, Achim achim.m...@iass-potsdam.de
Date: 18 Aug 2014 17:51
Subject: CEC14 - Draft Berlin Declaration
To: i...@ce-conference.org i...@ce-conference.org
Cc:
Dear participants of CEC14,
Please find attached the draft of the proposed Berlin
Hi, John - Sorry if what I wrote came off as aggressive, but suggesting
deployment of SRM in 9 months is itself aggressive provocative.
Yes, there's plenty of evidence a big volcanic eruption provides quick,
powerful negative forcing to the climate. So, on a local scale, does
turning on
Hi, John -
For me, there's a complex mix of facts and fictions in all this.
In terms of Jennifer Francis her work, she wrote to your group
specifically, after I suggested it, and stated that she emphatically did
not think that arctic geoengineering (and this was on the assumption that
the
Poster's note : it's a shame that the so-called 'Berlin declaration' has
already been reported worldwide. I haven't spoken to anyone in Berlin who
is openly supportive of the text, or most particularly the process. It's
not come from the conference process, it's not been voted on, it's not been
