To the geoengineering group,
What are the ramifications of calling for "carbon removal"? I think the
issue is more than semantic hair-splitting.
I addressed this by responding a month ago to Noah Deich's article
analogizing carbon to trash:
It becomes more problematic if we think about the precedent of selecting
for super resilient individuals of every species ...
ᐧ
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Greg Rau wrote:
> Thinly disguised GMO? How did this evade ETC's and CBD's super sensitive
> radar?
> Greg
>
>
>
http://hopefulvision.blogspot.com/2011/07/could-seawater-flooded-deserts-help-re.html
Here's a glance at the Sahara flooding concept, with some math and
implications.
Brian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe
Hi John,
Just to be clear, I'm in favor of research, investigation, and action. But
don't think that it's sufficiently persuasive to say to policy makers "by
the time concentrations are rising rapidly, it will be too late." That
simply will not be enough to trigger the drastic immediate action
Poster's note : Relevant to DAC. Received much media coverage. EG
Science Daily at
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/10/151022141716.htm,
http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S1399004715012183
Acta Cryst. (2015). D71, 1745-1756
doi:10.1107/S1399004715012183
BUY ARTICLE
Structural and