[geo] RE: Is it still geoengineering if one doesn't say so, and it's in the wrong direction?: [CDR] Permitting for mCDR and mSRM | US EPA

Brian, See my comments added in blue to your email below. Chris. From: carbondioxideremo...@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of Brian Cady Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2024 10:28 AM To: Chris Vivian ; geoengineering Cc: Renaud de RICHTER ; Carbon Dioxide Removal ;

[geo] Multi-model simulation of solar geoengineering indicates avoidable destabilization of the West Antarctic ice sheet

*This item and others will be in the monthly “Solar Geoengineering Updates Substack” newsletter:* https://solargeoengineeringupdates.substack.com/ --- https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU24/EGU24-7071.html *AUTHORS* John Moore,

[geo] Is it still geoengineering if one doesn't say so, and it's in the wrong direction?: [CDR] Permitting for mCDR and mSRM | US EPA

Hi Chris and all, Thanks for your note, Chris, As 'geoengineering' can be defined as intentionally changing our climate, and as fossil fuel extraction and sale, when such is known to change our climate, can thus be defined as geoengineering, and as fossil fuel extraction firms have long known

[geo] Re: [CDR] Permitting for mCDR and mSRM | US EPA

Would fossil fuel extraction and dispersal without a EPA permit, when the agent of this knows/knew about the ultimate oceanic fate of most of this greenhouse gas pollution, and the climate effect, violate this USA law? Brian - On Tue, Mar 26, 2024, 13:29 Renaud de RICHTER wrote: >