Re: [geo] Michigan Scientists See Urgency for Negative Emissions | Climate Central

2016-09-01 Thread Bhaskar M V
John The diagram is quite complex, since you have put the problems and solutions in the same diagram. These can be separated to help focus on the solutions. Diatoms seeding would not be necessary, they are already present in large numbers in all natural waterways. You just have to increase the nu

Re: [geo] CIGI : assessing scientific legitimacy: the case of marine geoengineering

2015-09-20 Thread Bhaskar M V
Andrew Since 2005 we have been regularly dosing Iron adsorbed onto Nano Silica in aquariums, ponds and lakes, to grow Diatom Algae and thus prevent other phytoplankton and weeds from growing. We do this by dosing Nualgi, our patented product that contains 10 micro-nutrients adsorbed onto Nano Sil

Re: [geo] Energy Planning and Decarbonization Technology | The Energy Collective

2015-01-27 Thread Bhaskar M V
Dear All Olivine is a silicate and thus increases the silica in the water. It also contains small amounts of iron, so iron to will become available. So diatoms will grow when Olivine weathering is used to capture CO2. Diatoms too will capture a lot of CO2. Silica to Nitrogen ratio is very import

[geo] Re: The fate of bioavailable iron in Antarctic coastal seas

2013-12-18 Thread Bhaskar M V
Andrew Diatoms consuming C, N, P, Si and Fe and sinking to the ocean bed is a solution not a problem. The fact that Fe depletes is a problem and this is precisely the reason why Iron Fertilization is being suggested. C, N, P are being fed to oceans due to human action. Si in bioavailable form (

Re: [geo] Iron Limitation Modulates Ocean Acidification Effects on Southern Ocean Phytoplankton Communities

2013-11-29 Thread Bhaskar M V
Ken I understand that your paper is based on theoretical computations and that your simulation is based on a global ocean carbon cycle model. "Here, using a global ocean carbon cycle model, we performed idealized ocean iron fertilization simulations to place an upper bound on the effect of iron f

Re: [geo] Re: New Research on OIF

2012-12-17 Thread Bhaskar M V
The report mentions Phytoplankton 22 times and cyanobacteria 15 times. Diatoms are not mentioned even once. Diatoms are responsible for about 40 to 50% of primary production in oceans. No one appears to have even attempted to quantify Cyanobacteria's share. Diatoms sink on death and hence sequest

Re: [geo] Re: New Research on OIF

2012-12-17 Thread Bhaskar M V
With population at 7 billion, projected to grow to 9 billion loss of any nutrients from soil is not a good idea, so transporting crop residue containing nutrients out to ocean may not be accepted as a matter of principle, irrespective of the numbers. There are many HNLCs in Ocean, so adding more n

Re: [geo] Re: New EPA report

2012-12-14 Thread Bhaskar M V
Ron My support for Ocean Fertilization is to secure maximum benefit with minimum intervention. That is why we are opposing 'harvesting' of Diatoms. The diatoms that grow should either be consumed by fish or fall to ocean bed. You have noted - "Two obvious economic problems with this option (which

Re: [geo] Re: Pacific iron fertilisation is 'blatant violation' of international regulations

2012-10-16 Thread Bhaskar M V
Ken You said "I piped up and said that all ocean fertilization could be considered mariculture and that the CO2 storage could be regarded as a co-benefit, achieved knowingly but not intentionally (just as when we drive a car we knowingly heat the planet although that is not our intent)." I agree

Re: [geo] Nature eifex report

2012-07-24 Thread Bhaskar M V
re >> were no calibrated instruments back then—the inferences usually come from >> the types of materials being deposited out of lakes and oceans, the pore >> sizes of fossil plants, etc.--all sorts of proxy data, and so there is >> clearly analysis, interpretation, and logic invol

Re: [geo] Nature eifex report

2012-07-23 Thread Bhaskar M V
usually come from > the types of materials being deposited out of lakes and oceans, the pore > sizes of fossil plants, etc.--all sorts of proxy data, and so there is > clearly analysis, interpretation, and logic involved. > > Mike > > > On 7/23/12 11:27 AM, "Bhaskar M V"

Re: [geo] Nature eifex report

2012-07-23 Thread Bhaskar M V
Mike Historical oxygen levels are a question of fact. No logic is involved. Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Earth A good graph of O2 levels http://www.nap.edu/openbook/0309100615/gifmid/30.gif http://www.pnas.org/content/96/20/10955.full Oxygen and Paleofires. The level of

Re: [geo] Nature eifex report

2012-07-19 Thread Bhaskar M V
Ken You are right to a certain extent when you say - "So, to some extent, iron fertilization concentrates productivity in space and in time." However the facts are as follows - Human action has increased the amount of N and P in water. The Nitrogen (and Phosphorus) cycles have been both speeded u

Re: Re: [geo] Re: Tropospheric Injection of Diatoms

2011-06-26 Thread BHASKAR M V
gesting > microbes to increase their productivity? If so, could the microbial > productivity (for digestion of methane) be further enhanced by mixing > nutrients with the diatoms in the spray? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > John >

Re: [geo] Re: Tropospheric Injection of Diatoms

2011-06-26 Thread BHASKAR M V
storming ideas like this for the methane-busting workshop, > London 3-4 September, are most welcome. > > --- > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:16 AM, BHASKAR M V wrote: > >> Dr Gorman >> >> I am referring to all three - >> Diatomaceous Earth and live diato

Re: [geo] Re: Tropospheric Injection of Diatoms

2011-06-26 Thread BHASKAR M V
does > > anybody know? > > > > Cheers, > > > > John > > > > P.S. Any brainstorming ideas like this for the methane-busting workshop, > > London 3-4 September, are most welcome. > > > > --- > > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:16 AM, BHA

Re: [geo] Re: Tropospheric Injection of Diatoms

2011-06-23 Thread BHASKAR M V
Dr Gorman I am referring to all three - Diatomaceous Earth and live diatoms as a SRM solution. Nano silica with micro nutrients to keep the live diatoms alive and cause further bloom after they fall into the oceans. DE is NOT in nano size. Is is in microns. Michael I understand that Crystalline

Re: [geo] Mineral Rain vs Biological Rain

2011-05-26 Thread BHASKAR M V
Hi John Thanks, but the paper is about DMS. DMS is produced by algae growing in oceans. Bioprecipitation (biological rain) is due to bacteria (and algae and fungi) in the atmosphere. regards Bhaskar On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 6:14 PM, JohnDuke wrote: > See Charlson, Lovelock, Andreae, Warren 1

Re: Re: [geo] Re: Mid-Oceanic Diatom Entrapment System Technology.....MODEST

2011-05-23 Thread BHASKAR M V
natively the mats would sink to the bottom such as > to sequester carbon for the long-term. > > That's my ideal scenario, OK. Now, can anybody work out how to produce > such a system? > > Cheers, > > John > > --- > > On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 7:45 AM, BHASKAR

Re: Re: [geo] Re: Mid-Oceanic Diatom Entrapment System Technology.....MODEST

2011-05-21 Thread BHASKAR M V
your help in understanding "How" you plan on utilizing this resource. > > Respectfully > > Michael > > > > On , BHASKAR M V wrote: > > Sargussum is a macro algae and not a micro algae. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sargassum > > > > > > Liv

Re: Re: [geo] Re: Mid-Oceanic Diatom Entrapment System Technology.....MODEST

2011-05-19 Thread BHASKAR M V
" you plan on utilizing this resource. > > Respectfully > > Michael > > > > On , BHASKAR M V wrote: > > Sargussum is a macro algae and not a micro algae. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sargassum > > > > > > Live Diatoms rise and sink every day. &g

[geo] Re: Continuous diatom blooms and Nualgi

2009-11-07 Thread BHASKAR M V
Mr Capron Diatoms increase the dissolved oxygen level within minutes. Thus anaerobic conditions are converted into aerobic conditions. In raw sewage that emits Hydrogen Sulphide due to anaerobic bacteria, use of Nualgi stops the generation of H2S within hours and thereafter aerobic conditions prev