I've watch the recent Cafe Scientifique videos on aerosol SRM and MCB. And
I've read dozens of articles on both. But I've yet to see a comparison of
the two approaches? Can anyone point me to a paper comparing the two
approaches (MCB v. stratospheric injection of aerosol)? Many thanks.
Eric
Contributeria is an online news journal where anyone (including
non-climatologist like me) can propose an article. If there are sufficient
votes, the article will be published and, probably, widely distributed.
My motivation is that I am tired of reading criticism of climate
engineering that
I thought listers who are interested in carbon capture might appreciate
this micrograph of trapped CO2. Might be useful for your slides...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pnnl/8146324880/in/photostream/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering
We just experienced 45+ degrees C in western US. Can any climate modelers
tell me whether extremes (not averages) of more than 60 C are possible? Or
is there some reason why 57.7 might still remain a temp record for many
decades?
Bonus: I know that humans can survive 57 C and higher but
Instead of sharing a paper, below is a 5 min video from the New York
Times
http://www.nytimes.com/video/2013/06/06/science/10002262388/reaching-for-the-sky.html
The Archangel Project wants to take cuttings from giant trees (Sequoias),
propagate them in the millions, and plant thousands
Is this applicable to marine cloud brightening?
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/05/30/1222190110
Abstract
Potential impacts of lightning-induced plasma on cloud ice formation and
precipitation have been a subject of debate for decades. Here, we report on
the interaction of
There is a kickstarter project to develop a robot that can help repair
coral due, in part, to climate change. Unfortunately they are roughly $US
60,000 short of their goal. Here is the kickstarter website if you are
interested in this and can help.
Mac modelers might find this interesting...
http://www.brown.edu/Research/Environmental_Physics/Environmental_Physics/Code.html
Any comments or warnings for amateur modelers welcomed!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To
I am curious what climate modelers think of the following paper
Basically, the authors want to simulate climate forcers rather than every
single area in a climate model Climate scientists might have missed
this paper as it was published in a physics journal
Summary for the
public:
Though it does not mention geoengineering, this Koch-funded NOVA episode
shows how satellite observations discover and map the influence
of Antarctica on climate, the Sahara dust on precipitation, and other
cycles that people here may not realize. I learned a lot and I was
wondering if any
I just watched the not-too-bad Project Earth episode on the feasibility of
covering the melting part (is this called the ABLATION zone?) of Greenland
glaciers with special plastic. They concluded that it does work, it will
probably help, but too much carbon would be emitted making the acres of
Can someone referred me to a paper that explores whether quantum computing
will really improve climate modeling in general and geoengineering effects
in particular? I thought I had read that better supercomputers will help
but that quantum computing does not add greatly to accuracy of climate
12 matches
Mail list logo
