: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 12:57:14 PM
Subject: RE: [geo] Cost of Air Capture and the APS report
Ron, Ken, and others:
Given that the Lima meeting is in its middle day today, let me push
everything aside to write answers to Ron’s questions. I am speaking only for
myself
: [geo] Cost of Air Capture and the APS report
From: johnnissen2...@gmail.com
To: andrew.lock...@gmail.com
CC: rongretlar...@comcast.net; geoengineering@googlegroups.com;
oliver.tick...@kyoto2.org; j...@cloudworld.co.uk
Hi all,
I've been concentrating on the Arctic methane threat for the past few
Nissen [johnnissen2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 4:50 AM
To: andrew.lock...@gmail.com
Cc: rongretlar...@comcast.net; geoengineering@googlegroups.com; Oliver Tickell;
John Nissen
Subject: Re: [geo] Cost of Air Capture and the APS report
Hi all,
I've been concentrating on the Arctic
PM
Subject: RE: [geo] Cost of Air Capture and the APS report
Ron, Ken, and others:
Given that the Lima meeting is in its middle day today, let me push everything
aside to write answers to Ron’s questions. I am speaking only for myself.
1. snip, emphasis added next
Item b. I know
: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 8:33:12 PM
Subject: RE: [geo] Cost of Air Capture and the APS report
Ron and others: I attach .pdfs for the report (revised) and the press release.
The links are:
Report:
http://www.aps.org/policy/reports/popa-reports/loader.cfm
*Cc: *geoengineering@googlegroups.com
*Sent: *Monday, June 20, 2011 8:33:12 PM
*Subject: *RE: [geo] Cost of Air Capture and the APS report
Ron and others: I attach .pdfs for the report (revised) and the press
release. The links are:
Report:
http://www.aps.org/policy/reports/popa-reports
Of
rongretlar...@comcast.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 12:03 PM
To: Robert Socolow
Cc: geoengineering@googlegroups.com; ke...@ucalgary.ca
Subject: Re: [geo] Cost of Air Capture and the APS report
Robert and ccs
1. Thanks for the added links and information. Not yet mentioned on
this list
: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 2:57
Subject: RE: [geo] Cost of Air Capture and the APS report
Ron, Ken, and others:
Given that the Lima meeting is in its middle day today, let me push
everything aside to write answers to Ron's questions. I am speaking only for
myself.
1. Yes
; rongretlar...@comcast.net
Cc: geoengineering@googlegroups.com; David Keith
Subject: Re: [geo] Cost of Air Capture and the APS report
I leave the Lima group with a final thought. Is SRM only an emergency
strategy? What are the pros and cons of a continuous ground-bass deployment of
1 W/m^2
: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 12:57:14 PM
Subject: RE: [geo] Cost of Air Capture and the APS report
Ron, Ken, and others:
Given that the Lima meeting is in its middle day today, let me push everything
aside to write answers to Ron’s questions. I am speaking only for myself.
1. Yes
To: Alvia Gaskill; soco...@princeton.edu; rongretlar...@comcast.net
Cc: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [geo] Cost of Air Capture and the APS report
Of course it's not only an emergency strategy.
Each group that has begun to think about it seriously has realized that.
I
21, 2011 12:57:14 PM
Subject: RE: [geo] Cost of Air Capture and the APS report
Ron, Ken, and others:
Given that the Lima meeting is in its middle day today, let me push
everything aside to write answers to Ron’s questions. I am speaking only for
myself.
1. Yes, there is only one change
Several recent posts have referred to the American Physical Society's report on
Air Capture.
We posted a critique of the report and in turn the APS released an updated
version that-using a post-facto kluge-addressed two of the errors that had
identified.
The our comments are posted on
13 matches
Mail list logo
