http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/100042/1/791917835.pdf

Conclusions

Even though it is frequently said that the climate engineering
strategy has yet to reach technical and institutional maturity and
that it poses both many and extensive risks, and even though
environmental policies remain committed to emission-cutting efforts,
an astonishing international preliminary action on the issue has
already been amassed.

This brings to mind a play titled "The Visit" by the Swiss writer
Friedrich Dürrenmatt: In this story, an matronly woman returns to the
small town where she grew up and makes the community an indecent
proposal: She will give the town a huge sum of money in return for the
killing of her former unfaithful lover. Outraged, the town rejects the
offer. But it rather obviously goes about the job of preparing for
this very eventuality and does things that make it even more likely.
The end to the story is well known. Given the potential impact of
climate engineering, it is not surprising that the preliminary
question of whether this environmental option should actually be
researched at all as a way of improving the public’s awareness of this
strategy is highly controversial.

In this new age of Anthropocene, in which the human race has had an
impact on nearly every geo-economic process, the vision of a man-made
climate appears to represent a temporary climax of humans’ presumed
domination of nature. In light of the international inability to
systematically cut emissions, environmental policies are painting
themselves into a crowded corner. To the right, there is the Scylla of
potentially irreversible latent effects of global warming. To the
left, there is the Charybdis of potentially uncontrollable and highly
combustible emergency steps to halt encroachment into the Earth
system. In this unpleasant situation, the pressure regarding fall-back
technologies in emergency situations may become so intense that
consideration of them will appear to be unavoidable. The seal on the
Pandora’s box of environmental policy may have already been broken. In
mythology, the complete opening of this box did bring trouble. But
after all, it also offered hope.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to