Re[2]: [geo] Michigan Scientists See Urgency for Negative Emissions | Climate Central

t;; "P. Wadhams" <p...@cam.ac.uk>; "Paul Beckwith" <pbeck...@uottawa.ca>; "Sev Clarke" <sevcla...@me.com>; "Ronal Larson" <rongretlar...@comcast.net>; "Brian Launder" <brian.laun...@manchester.ac.uk>; "Alan Page&quo

Re: [geo] Michigan Scientists See Urgency for Negative Emissions | Climate Central

Hi Bhaskar and everyone, I have drawn the attached diagram to include all the major interventions I think are required for climate restoration. I have put a target of 2050, which I think could be achieved with a determined international collaboration, especially to save the sea ice. (If the

Re: [geo] Michigan Scientists See Urgency for Negative Emissions | Climate Central

John, list  et al: Your diagram is helpful.   -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this

Re: [geo] Michigan Scientists See Urgency for Negative Emissions | Climate Central

Bhaskar et al You are mostly correct below, but leaving out the fact that the “8 Billion tons of Carbon consumption per year” is nearly balanced by the subsequent return of that carbon as the biomass rots or is consumed by “critters”. The net annual change is a small part of that 8

Re: [geo] Michigan Scientists See Urgency for Negative Emissions | Climate Central

John, list, et al: Apologies if this comes to you twice. Am still at the conference hotel and have had trouble sending. This time much shorter. > On Aug 25, 2016, at 9:08 AM, Ronal W. Larson > wrote: > > John, list et al: > > Re your almost last

Re: [geo] Michigan Scientists See Urgency for Negative Emissions | Climate Central

* Benjamin Sanderson > *Cc:* geoengineering; Andrew Lockley; P. Wadhams; Paul Beckwith > *Subject:* Re: [geo] Michigan Scientists See Urgency for Negative > Emissions | Climate Central > > > > Dear Benjamin, > > I was interested to read your paper, co-authored with Bria

RE: [geo] Michigan Scientists See Urgency for Negative Emissions | Climate Central

@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Nissen Sent: dinsdag 23 augustus 2016 0:02 To: Benjamin Sanderson Cc: geoengineering; Andrew Lockley; P. Wadhams; Paul Beckwith Subject: Re: [geo] Michigan Scientists See Urgency for Negative Emissions | Climate Central Dear Benjamin, I was interested to read your

Re: [geo] Michigan Scientists See Urgency for Negative Emissions | Climate Central

Dear Benjamin, I was interested to read your paper, co-authored with Brian O'Neill and Claudia Tobaldi, about what it would take to achieve the Paris temperature targets [1]. There is clearly a limit of what can be achieved in emissions reductions, of around 50% per decade if 7% per year were

[geo] Michigan Scientists See Urgency for Negative Emissions | Climate Central

http://www.climatecentral.org/news/scientists-see-urgency-for-negative-emissions-20588 Michigan Scientists See Urgency for Negative Emissions Published: August 8th, 2016 By Bobby Magill ANN ARBOR, Mich. — When Sarang Supekar describes how he thinks global warming will have to be stabilized, he