Re: [geo] Re: [CDR] Going natural

I would just note that it is not really just temperature that matters--when at relatively high temperatures what matters is heat index, so that if you reduce peak temperature a bit but significantly up the humidity, this does not necessarily help on the health side. What it would be really

Re: [geo] Re: [CDR] Going natural

Atmospheric haze is AFAIK cooling. Perhaps modellers and environmental scientists on the list can comment? On 21 Jan 2018 12:37, "Brian Cartwright" wrote: To save some the time of listening to Walter’s 45-minute exposition, here is a synopsis of some main points.

[geo] Re: [CDR] Going natural

To save some the time of listening to Walter’s 45-minute exposition, here is a synopsis of some main points. His overall argument is that changes in land management can create physical and hydrological conditions that have an overall cooling effect. He advocates creating a “soil carbon

[geo] Re: [CDR] Going natural

... and the all-important link: https://vimeo.com/251739209 Brian On Saturday, January 20, 2018 at 10:08:32 AM UTC-5, Brian Cartwright wrote: > > Thanks to Andrew and Greg. I didn't go through paywall but my comment > picks up on the mention of "land management" as a way to accomplish CDR. > >

[geo] Re: [CDR] Going natural

Thanks to Andrew and Greg. I didn't go through paywall but my comment picks up on the mention of "land management" as a way to accomplish CDR. I'd like to suggest that land management can be seen as a way to do hydrological cooling where carbon reduction is NOT the primary metric of success.