It seems to me over-stated to say the report was "leaked". At this
stage, a review copy was sent to:
(1) every nation in the world for review--and the US has since the
mid-1990s made a copy available to anyone who wants to review it through
a Federal Register notice (we could never figure out
I don’t see this as “secretive”. Peer review has its problems, but on the
whole I’d rather see stuff peer reviewed before being made public, at least
when there is likely to be public attention.
The first order draft had no shortage of factual errors; wouldn’t you rather
make sure that
I'm not sure whether I qualify as an expert. I've published a few
semi-relevant academic journal pieces, and written a lot of journalistic
articles on new energy.
Here's my take.
Firstly, there has been no meaningful reduction in CO2 emissions, as a
result of government policies. Almost all the
