RE: [geo] Subcommittee on Environment and Subcommittee on Energy Hearing - Geoengineering: Innovation, Research, and Technology

2017-11-01 Thread Douglas MacMartin
You can infer something of the expected focus from the people they chose to invite, though I haven’t been told to restrict my comments to SRM. doug From: geoengineering@googlegroups.com [mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Greg Rau Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 5:40

Re: [geo] Subcommittee on Environment and Subcommittee on Energy Hearing - Geoengineering: Innovation, Research, and Technology

2017-11-01 Thread Alan Robock
Looks like it to me.  The new AGU statement on geoengineering does not use the word "geoengineering," but rather climate intervention, and divides it like the NAS, into albedo modification and CDR.  But that term will persist for a long time. Alan Alan Robock, Distinguished Professor

Re: [geo] Subcommittee on Environment and Subcommittee on Energy Hearing - Geoengineering: Innovation, Research, and Technology

2017-11-01 Thread Greg Rau
Thanks, Alan. Is it safe to assume that this is an SRM hearing?Greg From: Alan Robock To: Geoengineering Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:05 PM Subject: [geo] Subcommittee on Environment and Subcommittee on Energy Hearing