Poster's note : This will be of interest to those examining GGR
trajectories, and the interplay between SRM and mitigation.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013GL059141/abstract?utm_content=buffer11d58utm_medium=socialutm_source=twitter.comutm_campaign=buffer
Keywords:
climate
Would anyone like to comment on this? It certainly deserves comment since right
or wrong it appears in an authoritative journal.
http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/news/10.1063/PT.5.8034?dm_i=1Y69,27QSN,E1MP2T,80LVA,1
--
You received this message because you are
Hi Greg,
The theory is that people tend to be polarised into two camps. One camp is
against the idea that climate change can have anything to do with our
greenhouse gas emissions; and therefore (subconsciously) this camp is
against geoengineering because it would admit of a massive problem to be
My understanding is that many conservatives are rather fond of
geoengineering as it allows the continuing BAU pathway (at least
superficially).
Further, as David Keith has pointed out, a degree of moral hazard is
entirely rational. However, what's surprising is that a degree of negative
or
The issue of energy distribution (getting the energy to shore) seems to be
a key operational and financial consideration. Having both the profits from
wind/wave/otec/solar energy conversion and MCB would help overcome the high
cost of the gear while establishing the largest possible cooling
Bart Verheggen makes a pretty good case that the Christy Spencer graph
of model vs observed results is misleading, for two reasons: it uses
only 5-year running averages, and because of the way it re-baselines:
And then there is Holdren¹s rebuttal of Christy. See
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/03/03/3349411/john-holdren-roger-pielk
e-climate-drought/
Mike
On 3/4/14 4:15 PM, David Appell david.app...@gmail.com wrote:
Bart Verheggen makes a pretty good case that the Christy Spencer graph
OOPS‹wrong skeptic. But article is god in any case.
Mike
And then there is Holdren¹s rebuttal of Christy. See
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/03/03/3349411/john-holdren-roger-pielk
e-climate-drought/
Mike
On 3/4/14 4:15 PM, David Appell david.app...@gmail.com wrote:
Bart
Buck up, John. Once the real hazards of rising sea level, failed crops, and
acidified oceans materialize, the decision-makers just might yearn for some
hazards of the moral kind. And you and I might still be around when that
happens. Even then there is no guarantee that any countering action
