Geoengineering the Earth's climate sends policy debate down a curious
rabbit hole
http://gu.com/p/4vey4
Geoengineering the Earth's climate sends policy debate down a curious
rabbit hole
Many of the world’s major scientific establishments are discussing the
concept of modifying the Earth’s
Hi gang,
I am grateful for being copied into your interesting correspondence. The
report was of both a public meeting with Stephen Gardiner (a philosopher) as
keynote and myself and Lauren Riccards as respondents, and then a full day
symposium the next day with Nigel Clark and myself as
The full paper is now available at
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1981907
Abstract:
We conducted a two-nation study (United States, n = 1500; England, n =
1500) to test a novel theory of science communication. The cultural
cognition thesis posits that individuals make
I basically agree with Ken's observations. I also share concerns about the
proliferation of non-novel writing, but I don't think these consume effort or
postpone action.
At least two factors are driving the production / overproduction of literature.
One is the crisis in academia-- by that I
-- Forwarded message --
From: i...@climate-engineering.eu i...@climate-engineering.eu
Date: 4 Aug 2014 15:36
Subject: Climate Engineering News Review for week 32 of 2014
To: andrew.lock...@gmail.com
Cc:
[image: tl_files/newsletter/NewsletterBalken.jpg]
Dear Climate Engineering
List and ccs:
Four points in this response to Ms. Buck (whose comments below I like
and are unrelated to this message):
1. Ms. Buck has provided by far the most cogent social science (not
including ethics, but she would be good at that too) information, that I have
seen - on
Would it be easier if a state's plan did so and EPA simply had to decide
whether to approve it?
On Jul 30, 2014, at 5:03 PM, Hawkins, Dave dhawk...@nrdc.org wrote:
While there is considerable room for innovation and flexibility in
implementing federal environmental statutes, Congress has
Prof Falk and ccs:
I have seen a sizable number of CDR and SRM classes of technical
innovations, but not 46. Can you identify a source for the 46? I think it is
not in your
Worlds in Transition: Evolving governance.. , but if so, I am closing
in on finding a library copy.
