While I agree with your projection please note nothing is costless. A major
reason chip labor is used is that it is still cheaper than AI/robotics. As that
changes, for better or worse, unemployment follows. Cost less NOT costless.
Michael Trachtenberg, PhD
Visiting Scientist
Department of
HI Adam,
The majority of physical chemical processes while controlled will not be
accelerated greatly beyond known maxima simply by applying computing
capabilities.
Mike
Michael Trachtenberg, PhD
Visiting Scientist
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology
Rutgers University
New
http://www.iucnworldconservationcongress.org/news/20160904/article/bonn-challenge-approaches-target-restore-150-million-hectares-degraded-land
Bonn Challenge approaches target to restore 150 million hectares of
degraded land
Sun, 04 Sep 2016
Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, 3 September 2016 (IUCN) – The
To counter :
Here's just one example from just this week in which the application of
computing power has yielded a leap forward in energy processes that may
readily be applied to CDR
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/09/160901211410.htm
On 7 Sep 2016 01:47, "Michael Trachtenberg"
Post-scarcity is unintuitive, and it can be a challenge to fully unpack all
of the assumptions we normally make about production. Just to clarify the
confusion about cost, let me reiterate that I am using the term in the
*economic
*sense. A commodity that is *economically *costless is something
