I strongly believe you should publish this as a formal paper. There are
social policy journals which represent perhaps a more appropriate route
than climate science journals.
It would seem that a statistical test for significance, plus a formal
statement of hypotheses, would be appropriate.
I'd
Ben,
With respect to your original question, I think Alan's right that it's
important to distinguish geoengineering research from geoengineering
deployment. I also think it's inaccurate to speak of an economic/
scientific community--in my experience these are two distinct
knowledge communities
Hi Folks,
Ben, I would be honored.
Dr. Benford, I can see how that statement could be viewed as a
strawman. However, under the current policy environment, deployment of GE
will be limited to an emergency situation only (may change..may not). the
most probable emergency is an Arctic Methane
