Comments on Biofuelwatch report, forwarded from another list
A
-- Forwarded message --
From: rongretlar...@comcast.net
Date: Nov 16, 2012 4:10 AM
Subject: Re: [geo] Bioenergy with Carbon Capture: Climate Saviour or
Dangerous Hype
To: biochar-policy biochar-pol...@yahoogroups.com
As someone pointed out to me, this survey was conducted just before Fukushima,
so it's a good bet that opinions on geoengineering have become more hostile, at
least for now.
Josh Horton
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To view
ironic if true
Rejection of nuclear power probably means that future atmospheric CO2
concentrations will be higher and climate change damage worse, thus more
likely that people may someday perceive deployment of solar geoengineering
as less odious than not doing so.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at
-- Forwarded Message
From: Lyle Birkey lbir...@ncseonline.org
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:48:55 -0600
To: Mike MacCracken mmacc...@comcast.net
Subject: Free Webinar on Climate Change Geoengineering - John Hopkins Univ.
- CAMEL Climate Change Continuing Education Symposium
If you're having
Mooney, Pat; et al. (2012):
Darken the sky and whiten the earth
http://www.climate-engineering.eu/single/items/mooney-pat-et-al-2012-darken-the-sky-and-whiten-the-earth.html
Mooney, Pat; Wetter, Kathy Jo; Bronson, Diana (2012):
Darken the sky and whiten the earth. The dangers of geoengineering.
A more direct link here:
http://whatnext.org/resources/Publications/Volume-III/Single-articles/wnv3_etcgroup_144.pdf
I thought these nuggets were especially revealing:
Why is geoengineering unacceptable?
It can’t be tested: No experimental phase is possible – in order to have a
noticeable
