Two other examples of anti-moral-hazard come to mind:
Geoengineering and the Science Communication Environment: A Cross-Cultural
Experiment
Dan M. Kahan et al
2012
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1981907
Britain can't afford to go cool on climate change
Guardian editorial
Poster's note : an opportunity to lobby for geoengineering sessions at EGU.
Any conveners out there?
http://geolog.egu.eu/2013/08/14/egu-2014-got-an-idea/
EGU 2014 – got an idea?
14AUG
Have a great idea for a conference session but haven’t quite put it into
practice? Now’s your chance!Until
The Cold War and the Apollo Program were not pursued in the expectation of
profiting from software spinoffs, LED lighting,CAT scanners, cell phones
and microwave popcorn.
Although the consequences, physical and economic, are global, one sees
little societal complaint about the unregulated
Dan sent this when I sent out a query to some social scientists on Alan's
geo-eng-group question (not sure if it was directly posted as well)
Geoengineering and the Science Communication Environment: A Cross-Cultural
Experiment
Andrew et al.,
Until actual field experience is developed, bio-manipulation, relative to
ebullition fields, does need to be limited to bioreactors and or
capture/harvest systems. Dr. Salter has offered one detailed mechanical
approach to capturing
Dr. Schulling etal
1. I support the use of olivine to the maximum extent possible.
2. But, maybe naively, I still am persuaded by the arguments of Jim
Hansen and Bill McKibben that we have to get back to 350 ppm CO2 (or lower).
Better that we do that sooner than later, by all
