List with ccs
1. Thanks to Sean for the alert of a paper I think is important.
Important on two grounds - the Haida/OIF controversy (I am not qualified to
discuss, but think we have not heard enough) and the use of the term
“Geoengineering” (where I have been regularly commenting and
Hi Folks,
This type of coverage seems to ignore all other GE concepts which are not
as nearly as controversial. Clearly and understandably, the media looks for
*the
most controversial *of all the concepts which can be deployed. Keith, and
most close observers of sulfur injection, understands
US Military Responds To Arctic Ocean Melting: Polar Ice Melting Prompts US
Military To Protect New Waterways [Maps]
By David Kashi http://www.ibtimes.com/reporters/david-kashi
on January 13 2014 11:07 AM
Bruce and list
My impression(quick skim only) is that the May White House document
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/nat_arctic_strategy.pdf
doesn’t say anything definitive. True?
Ron
On Jan 14, 2014, at 2:08 PM, French, Bruce bruce.fre...@yorkrsg.com wrote:
US
Greg etal
Because this paper is behind a paywall, I can barely glean from their
figures that they may be looking at a fifty year time horizon. Did they look
at all at either SRM or CDR when using the term “irreversibility? (quotes in
the original - why?)
Ron
On Jan 14, 2014, at 12:43
Keith etal (adding in John Nissen and Peter Flynn )
1. Most interesting. I own a solar thermal system with the same heat pipe
theory at work - and would have never carried it over to your Pine Island
example. This to answer your first question on my part. Thanks.
2. Adding John and
