Poster's note: missed previously https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13698230.2020.1694216?journalCode=fcri20
The Panglossian politics of the geoclique Catriona McKinnon <https://www.tandfonline.com/author/McKinnon%2C+Catriona>[image: ORCID Icon] <https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0434-1083> Pages 584-599 | Published online: 20 Nov 2019 - Download citation <https://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080%2F13698230.2020.1694216> - https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2020.1694216 - [image: CrossMark Logo]CrossMark <https://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog?doi=10.1080%2F13698230.2020.1694216&domain=www.tandfonline.com&uri_scheme=https%3A&cm_version=v2.0> Select Language▼ Translator disclaimer <https://www.tandfonline.com/action/clickThrough?id=3310&url=%2Fpage%2Fterms-and-conditions%23googletranslate&loc=%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1080%2F13698230.2020.1694216%3FjournalCode%3Dfcri20&pubId=53701448&placeholderId=1084&productId=2797> - Full Article <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13698230.2020.1694216?scroll=top&needAccess=true> - Figures & data <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/figure/10.1080/13698230.2020.1694216?scroll=top&needAccess=true> - References <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ref/10.1080/13698230.2020.1694216?scroll=top> - Citations <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/citedby/10.1080/13698230.2020.1694216?scroll=top&needAccess=true> - - Metrics <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13698230.2020.1694216?journalCode=fcri20#metrics-content> - Reprints & Permissions <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13698230.2020.1694216?tab=permissions&scroll=top> - Get access <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13698230.2020.1694216?journalCode=fcri20> - <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13698230.2020.1694216?journalCode=fcri20#> <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13698230.2020.1694216?journalCode=fcri20#> <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13698230.2020.1694216?journalCode=fcri20#>More Share Options <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13698230.2020.1694216?journalCode=fcri20#> ABSTRACT Solar radiation management (SRM) – a form of geoengineering – creates a risk of ‘termination shock’. If SRM was to be stopped abruptly then temperatures could rise very rapidly with catastrophic impacts. Two prominent geoengineering researchers have recently argued that the risk of termination shock could be minimised through the adoption of ‘relatively simple’ policies. This paper shows their arguments to be premised on heroically optimistic assumptions about the prospects for global cooperation and sustained trust in an SRM deployment scenario. The paper argues that worst-case scenarios are the right place to start in thinking about the governance of SRM. KEYWORDS: Solar radiation management <https://www.tandfonline.com/keyword/Solar+Radiation+Management>, termination shock <https://www.tandfonline.com/keyword/Termination+Shock>, worst-case scenarios <https://www.tandfonline.com/keyword/Worst-case+Scenarios>, geoengineering governance <https://www.tandfonline.com/keyword/Geoengineering+Governance>, precautionary action <https://www.tandfonline.com/keyword/Precautionary+Action> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-06hbm0oJRitLLgqZccC0eHKvtyvwhqkfNWTz_Ds1C_NRQ%40mail.gmail.com.
