[mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ken Caldeira
Sent: vrijdag 23 augustus 2013 21:31
To: Ronal Larson
Cc: Greg Rau; geoengineering; ui2...@columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [geo] DAC vs CRD?
The transportation sector accounts for 28 percent of greenhouse gas
emissions
Article below. The usual suspects and viewpoints, e.g. :
Pulling vexing carbon emissions straight from the sky might become an
important way to keep climate change in check. As pilot projects move forward,
the prospect of capturing carbon dioxide from the air is growing increasingly
plausible,
On Aug 23, 2013, at 12:05 PM, Rau, Greg r...@llnl.gov wrote:
Greg etal:
This is to comment on a line in the EE report you posed, which said:
The transportation sector accounts for 28 percent of greenhouse gas
emissions in the United States, according to U.S. EPA, so there is still a
*The transportation sector accounts for 28 percent of greenhouse gas
emissions in the United States, according to U.S. EPA, so there is still a
critical need for a way to reduce the overall carbon dioxide produced from
mobile sources.*
There is a critical need to reduce carbon dioxide emissions
Ken, Greg, list:
First to Greg (re just earlier message) - I recognized CRD as a typo.
Thanks.
Yes to all of Ken's remarks below .
My additional point was that we (geoengineering list) do have one
company which claims the more you drive with their product - the more carbon
