https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2019EF001393

Greenland Ice Sheet Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Injection
Geoengineering
John C. Moore Chao Yue Liyun Zhao Xiaoran Guo Shingo Watanabe Duoying Ji
First published: 14 December 2019
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001393
About
Sections


Share on
Abstract
The Greenland ice sheet is expected lose at least 90% of its current volume
if ice sheet summer temperatures warm by around 1.8 °C above
pre‐industrial. Geoengineering by stratospheric sulfate aerosol injection
might slow Greenland ice sheet melting and sea level rise by reducing
summer temperature and insolation; however, such schemes could also reduce
precipitation and affect large‐scale climate drivers such as the Atlantic
Meridional Over‐turning Circulation (AMOC). Earlier work found that AMOC
increased under geoengineering and that might lead to greater mass loss
from Greenland than under greenhouse gas forcing alone. We simulated
Greenland ice sheet climates using four Earth system models running the
stratospheric sulfate aerosol injection experiment GeoMIP G4 and the CMIP
RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 greenhouse gas scenarios that were then used to drive the
surface energy and mass balance model, SEMIC. Simulated runoff is 20% lower
under G4 than RCP4.5, while under RCP8.5 it is 17% higher. The mechanism is
through increased Arctic sea ice concentration and reduced humidity leading
to surface cooling of the ablation zone. Reduced absorption of outgoing
longwave radiation caused by hydrological cycle weakening dominates
associated decreases in precipitation under geoengineering and stronger
AMOC than under RCP4.5. An ice dynamics model simulates 15% lower ice
losses under G4 than RCP4.5. Thus, total sea level rise by 2070 from the
Greenland ice sheet under G4 geoengineering is about 15–20% lower than
under the RCP4.5 scenario.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-061QY8qvFSjEvS6YaLDs3njHAuJAFCRyTQjm1JG0O0_CA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to