etitors canned soups.MarkMark E. Capron, PEVentura, Californiawww.PODenergy.org
---- Original Message ----
Subject: Re: [geo] IPCC: CDR must be considered
From: "Ronal W. Larson" rongretlar...@comcast.net
Date: Thu, January 16, 2014 10:29 pm
To: RAU greg gh...@sbcglobal.net
Cc: Geoengineering geo
geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 9:25 AM
Subject: RE: [geo] IPCC: CDR must be considered
Andrew, Greg, Ron,
Any of you game to start a negcar...@googlegroups.com?
It appears we need to create a firewall (canyon, mountain, ocean, big
obstacle) between geo
www.PODenergy.org
Original Message
Subject: Re: [geo] IPCC: CDR must be considered
From: Ronal W. Larson rongretlar...@comcast.net
Date: Thu, January 16, 2014 10:29 pm
To: RAU greg gh...@sbcglobal.net
Cc: Geoengineering geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Greg and list:
Three
This is apparently from the upcoming IPCC Mitigation volume, or something else?
CDRer's mount up?
Greg
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/environment/climate-change/sucking-co2-from-atmosphere-may-be-only-way-to-meet-climate-goals-un-report-says-20140116-30vnr.html
Sucking CO2 from atmosphere may be
: [geo] IPCC: CDR must be considered
This is apparently from the upcoming IPCC Mitigation volume, or something
else? CDRer's mount up?
Greg
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/environment/climate-change/sucking-co2-from-atmosphere-may-be-only-way-to-meet-climate-goals-un-report-says-20140116
