Biochar can be defended on the basis of it being good for the soil,
and it certainly does not hurt the CO2 problem.
But if you want to defend biofuels, then you should do it on
economics, and on that, I don't think it can be done. Always willing
to look at the numbers, but have never seen an anal
Keith:
Glad you are supportive of biochar. But I have to also defend biofuels -
as they can come at little added cost if you want to make charcoal (or vice
versa - char production can follow biofuels).
Also I think you are gong to have a very hard time convincing many on this
list tha
List:
1.A friend just sent me this on peak oil:
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2013/dec/23/british-petroleum-geologist-peak-oil-break-economy-recession/print
which leads one to a no-fee introductory article, with an oblique relationship
to geoengineering, at:
