[geo] Re: Relocate the moon to Earth Sun L1

2011-02-20 Thread BradGuth
: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:25:51 -0800 Subject: [geo] Re: Relocate the moon to Earth Sun L1 From: bradg...@gmail.com To: geoengineering@googlegroups.com Using the centripetal force of a tethered mass (say 10 million tonnes), as the tug that's located 2x L2 (122,700 km) further out, is what’s

RE: [geo] Re: Relocate the moon to Earth Sun L1

2011-02-17 Thread Veli Albert Kallio
Subject: [geo] Re: Relocate the moon to Earth Sun L1 From: bradg...@gmail.com To: geoengineering@googlegroups.com Using the centripetal force of a tethered mass (say 10 million tonnes), as the tug that's located 2x L2 (122,700 km) further out, is what’s going to literally pull this off

[geo] Re: Relocate the moon to Earth Sun L1

2011-02-16 Thread BradGuth
As long as I’m crazy enough to be proposing the use of our moon in order to geoengineer a way out of our GW/AGW mess, we might as well consider directly utilizing the moon itself. Our moon has been shrinking and/or deflating as it cools (roughly 100 nm/year) and further solidifies, so we might as

[geo] Re: Relocate the moon to Earth Sun L1

2011-02-16 Thread BradGuth
Using the centripetal force of a tethered mass (say 10 million tonnes), as the tug that's located 2x L2 (122,700 km) further out, is what’s going to literally pull this off. Don’t always trust my math, because I’ve estimated an initial tug force of only 3.466e6 kg, though obviously this tethered

[geo] Re: Relocate the moon to Earth Sun L1

2011-02-13 Thread BradGuth
Exactly, at roughly 50% the ocean tides we have now, and otherwise happening exactly the same every 12 hours (noon and midnight) so that there's never any human or other biodiversity confusion, should go a long ways towards improving matters for our infrastructure functionality, as well as

[geo] Re: Relocate the moon to Earth Sun L1

2011-02-13 Thread BradGuth
At 7.35e22 kg, our moon is definitely a heavy sucker that’s perhaps only 0.1% hollow as is. However, besides our desperate need of interactive shade for geoengineering our GW and AGW problems away, Earth can always use minerals and precious metals or rear-earths, and what could possibly be more

[geo] Re: Relocate the moon to Earth Sun L1

2011-02-08 Thread O Morton
also, lower tides means less risk from raised sea level... On Feb 5, 6:22 pm, BradGuth bradg...@gmail.com wrote: It's not as hard as you might think, and we'd get up to 3.5% shade, although that could easily be adjusted to suit, and there are a few other benefits besides terrific job security