Re: [geos-devel] What do GEOSSymDifference and GEOSIntersection (CAPI) do?

2010-02-10 Thread strk
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:00:31PM +0100, Roger Bivand wrote: I've tried to go through GEOSPolygonize() to put the MULTILINESTRING together again, and am analysing what has happened, but think that the output has lost hole attributions, so needs running through GEOSContains or similar.

Re: [geos-devel] Re: cmake: distclean-like ? out of source tree build ?

2010-02-10 Thread strk
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 09:13:46PM +, Mateusz Loskot wrote: Mateusz Loskot wrote: mlos...@dog:~/dev/geos/_svn/trunk$ svn-clean By the way, if you are suspicious about some remaining garbage in the source tree, just run svn-clean and confirm you have trunk up-to-date with nothing

Re: [geos-devel] What do GEOSSymDifference and GEOSIntersection (CAPI) do?

2010-02-10 Thread Roger Bivand
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, strk wrote: On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 02:44:44PM +0100, Roger Bivand wrote: On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, strk wrote: On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:35:46PM +0100, Roger Bivand wrote: Are GEOSSymDifference() and GEOSIntersection() intended to take at least POLYGON inputs, and then

[geos-devel] deprecate non-thread-safe CAPI interfaces

2010-02-10 Thread strk
I'd like to deprecate non-thread-safe version of CAPI interface in next release, and stop providing them for new methods. If anyone sees a reason not to do that please scream before it's too late (you've plenty of time). --strk; () Free GIS Flash consultant/developer /\

Re: [geos-devel] deprecate non-thread-safe CAPI interfaces

2010-02-10 Thread Howard Butler
On Feb 10, 2010, at 5:26 PM, strk wrote: I'd like to deprecate non-thread-safe version of CAPI interface in next release, and stop providing them for new methods. If anyone sees a reason not to do that please scream before it's too late (you've plenty of time). The proposal would be to

Re: [geos-devel] deprecate non-thread-safe CAPI interfaces

2010-02-10 Thread Roger Bivand
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Howard Butler wrote: On Feb 10, 2010, at 5:26 PM, strk wrote: I'd like to deprecate non-thread-safe version of CAPI interface in next release, and stop providing them for new methods. If anyone sees a reason not to do that please scream before it's too late (you've