On 26/05/10 02:27, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Martin Davis wrote:
Maybe strk is right, and this should be changed to an enum. Perhaps
the enum could be defined as
XY = 2
XYZ = 3
XYZM = 4
XYM = 5 ?
Or perhaps there is already a convention covering this?
My personal opinion is that the
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:41:53AM -0400, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Note that I'll default to writing the new syntax. I'm not sure if I
will support writing the old syntax or not via a flag.
If current WKTWriter didn't output old syntax it makes perfectly
sense to start the support with new
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:27:16PM -0400, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
I think we will have to change the values returned by the C API getDimension
function to match C++ even though this introduces a modest risk of problems
for applications using the undocumented current behavior.
What's the
getDimension follows the OGC spec. Seems to me it's better to simply
change it to match the spec and the C++ API. This was clearly a bug in
the first place, no?
strk wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:27:16PM -0400, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
I think we will have to change the values
I have to disagree. Mathematically speaking the topological dimension
is a counting number (e.g. in the set {0,1,2,...}. I don't see any
reason why this shouldn't be represented as an integer value (and plenty
of reasons why it should - e.g. ordering, comparison, etc)
strk wrote:
On Tue,
