On 2017-03-16 12:21, Even Rouault wrote:
On jeudi 16 mars 2017 09:48:44 CET Bas Couwenberg wrote:
On 2017-03-16 09:42, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 09:41:12AM +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 2017-03-16 09:38, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>> >I don't know why JTS copyright
On jeudi 16 mars 2017 09:48:44 CET Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> On 2017-03-16 09:42, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 09:41:12AM +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> >> On 2017-03-16 09:38, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> >> >I don't know why JTS copyright holders wanted to "eclipse" their
> >>
On 2017-03-16 09:42, Sandro Santilli wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 09:41:12AM +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
On 2017-03-16 09:38, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>I don't know why JTS copyright holders wanted to "eclipse" their
>license...
IIRC LocationTech requires projects under its umbrella to use
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 09:41:12AM +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> On 2017-03-16 09:38, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> >I don't know why JTS copyright holders wanted to "eclipse" their
> >license...
>
> IIRC LocationTech requires projects under its umbrella to use permissive
> licenses to be more
On 2017-03-16 09:38, Sandro Santilli wrote:
I don't know why JTS copyright holders wanted to "eclipse" their
license...
IIRC LocationTech requires projects under its umbrella to use permissive
licenses to be more business friendly.
Kind Regards,
Bas
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 07:06:17PM -0400, Daniel Baston wrote:
> Some interesting new code has recently gone into JTS, for example a KNN
> search on STRtrees (https://github.com/locationtech/jts/pull/75).
>
> JTS is now under the Eclipse license. Can post-1.14 contributions still be
> ported to
