On 10/18/21 10:33 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> Having gone through numerous beta and rc releases, and hearing no
> further screams of agony, I call the vote on releasing 3.10.0.
You should only release 3.10.0 if that only entails renaming rc2.
If not, you should first release rc3.
Kind Regards,
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 at 10:27, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> I'd rather not install `geosop` than letting it core-dump so easily.
By default, geosop is installed into bin. Users that only need the
library may want to toggle the BUILD_GEOSOP option:
$ cmake -DBUILD_GEOSOP=OFF ..
(also a point-and-click
On 2021-10-18 5:33 p.m., Paul Ramsey wrote:
Having gone through numerous beta and rc releases, and hearing no
further screams of agony, I call the vote on releasing 3.10.0.
+1
+1 jeff
___
geos-devel mailing list
geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org
+1
From: geos-devel [mailto:geos-devel-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of
Daniel Baston
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 6:20 PM
To: GEOS Development List
Subject: Re: [geos-devel] 3.10.0 Release Vote
+1
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 4:34 PM Paul Ramsey mailto:pram...@cleverelephant.ca
+1
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 4:34 PM Paul Ramsey
wrote:
> Having gone through numerous beta and rc releases, and hearing no
> further screams of agony, I call the vote on releasing 3.10.0.
>
> +1
>
> P
> ___
> geos-devel mailing list
>
Current main branch (4a7fd4c5c726441ecf47be31f1654a803eac52a2)
builds and passes `make check` on
- Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
- Ubuntu 20.10
+1 for final
--strk;
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 02:49:08PM -0700, Martin Davis wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 2:27 PM Sandro Santilli wrote
>
> >
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 2:27 PM Sandro Santilli wrote
>
> $ geosop help test
> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::invalid_argument'
> what(): stod
> Aborted (core dumped)
>
> I'd rather not install `geosop` than letting it core-dump so easily.
> It was ticketed as
Um,
- plenty of betas, plenty of rc,
- the configure thing is your own addition: fix it to force a nocache, or just
drop it,
- and we're also re-litigating cmake too (the docs unambiguously provide
out-of-tree examples only)?
- geosop is not mission critical, it can be patched up in micro
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 01:33:52PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> Having gone through numerous beta and rc releases, and hearing no
> further screams of agony, I call the vote on releasing 3.10.0.
>
> +1
I know I'm late to the party but I'm trying builds on multiple
machines now.
The fist thing
+1
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 1:34 PM Paul Ramsey
wrote:
> Having gone through numerous beta and rc releases, and hearing no
> further screams of agony, I call the vote on releasing 3.10.0.
>
> +1
>
> P
> ___
> geos-devel mailing list
>
Having gone through numerous beta and rc releases, and hearing no
further screams of agony, I call the vote on releasing 3.10.0.
+1
P
___
geos-devel mailing list
geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
11 matches
Mail list logo
