Re: [geos-devel] PHP bindings anyone ?

2010-06-16 Thread Sean Gillies
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Robert Coup robert.c...@koordinates.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:16 PM, strk s...@keybit.net wrote: I'm plaing with drupal recently and be wondering if the SWIG binding for GEOS are still in use by anyone or not. In particular, I think Shapely and

Re: [geos-devel] PHP bindings anyone ?

2010-06-16 Thread strk
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 09:53:00AM +0200, Sean Gillies wrote: Are there any libffi (used by ctypes) intefaces for PHP? If so, I'd recommend giving that a try. Found this: http://pecl.php.net/package/ffi Last release (0.3-alpha) is from 2004 :! --strk; () Free GIS Flash

Re: [geos-devel] PHP bindings anyone ?

2010-06-16 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 16/06/10 09:21, strk wrote: On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 09:53:00AM +0200, Sean Gillies wrote: Are there any libffi (used by ctypes) intefaces for PHP? If so, I'd recommend giving that a try. Found this: http://pecl.php.net/package/ffi Last release (0.3-alpha) is from 2004 :! Sandro, You

Re: [geos-devel] PHP bindings anyone ?

2010-06-16 Thread Charlie Savage
On 6/16/2010 1:53 AM, Sean Gillies wrote: On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Robert Coup robert.c...@koordinates.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:16 PM, strks...@keybit.net wrote: I'm plaing with drupal recently and be wondering if the SWIG binding for GEOS are still in use by anyone

[geos-devel] PHP bindings anyone ?

2010-06-15 Thread strk
I'm plaing with drupal recently and be wondering if the SWIG binding for GEOS are still in use by anyone or not. In particular, I think Shapely and GeoDjango are using a direct interface rather than swig, right ? Is anyone else interested in a PHP binding for GEOS ? --strk; () Free GIS

Re: [geos-devel] PHP bindings anyone ?

2010-06-15 Thread Robert Coup
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:16 PM, strk s...@keybit.net wrote: I'm plaing with drupal recently and be wondering if the SWIG binding for GEOS are still in use by anyone or not. In particular, I think Shapely and GeoDjango are using a direct interface rather than swig, right ? Yep, they