Re: [geos-devel] RFC 5: C++11 Compilation Mode

2017-04-03 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 3 April 2017 at 23:48, Howard Butler wrote: >> On Apr 3, 2017, at 3:55 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> >>> but I too would note that range-based for loops don't work in MSVC 2013. >> >> Hmm, I'm not sure it's clear to me - I've not noticed any problem there.

Re: [geos-devel] RFC 5: C++11 Compilation Mode

2017-04-03 Thread Howard Butler
> On Apr 3, 2017, at 3:55 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >> but I too would note that range-based for loops don't work in MSVC 2013. > > Hmm, I'm not sure it's clear to me - I've not noticed any problem there. > Range-based statement should work pretty well in VS2013, even in

Re: [geos-devel] RFC 5: C++11 Compilation Mode

2017-04-03 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 3 April 2017 at 17:19, Howard Butler wrote: >> On Apr 1, 2017, at 11:44 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 06:25:09PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >>> I'd rather wait for more votes than two. >>> If no more votes arrive, I'll mark the RFC 5 as

Re: [geos-devel] RFC 5: C++11 Compilation Mode

2017-04-03 Thread Howard Butler
> On Apr 1, 2017, at 11:44 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 06:25:09PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> I'd rather wait for more votes than two. >> If no more votes arrive, I'll mark the RFC 5 as referred or withdrawn. > > You might have noticed that PSC has

Re: [geos-devel] RFC 5: C++11 Compilation Mode

2017-04-01 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 07:06:52PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > I guess my two cents are requested because of the explicit CC. Yes Sebastiaan, thanks a lot for your confirmation :) --strk; ___ geos-devel mailing list

Re: [geos-devel] RFC 5: C++11 Compilation Mode

2017-04-01 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 29 March 2017 at 23:18, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > Dear PSC, All, > > For your delectation, RFC5 > > This document proposes to switch GEOS to C++11 as > minimum supported version of C++ language. > > Please review, provide your feedback.

Re: [geos-devel] RFC 5: C++11 Compilation Mode

2017-04-01 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 06:25:09PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > I'd rather wait for more votes than two. > If no more votes arrive, I'll mark the RFC 5 as referred or withdrawn. You might have noticed that PSC has not been very active, lately, so I would not wait for those votes to arrive.

Re: [geos-devel] RFC 5: C++11 Compilation Mode

2017-04-01 Thread Sandro Santilli
Given 2 positive votes and no vetos over a period of 2 working days I declare the proposal ACCEPTED by the PSC (somewhat reduced in responsiveness, but that's to be dealt with another time). Mateusz: dunno if you want to update its status to be "accepted" or something like that ... --strk; On

Re: [geos-devel] RFC 5: C++11 Compilation Mode

2017-03-30 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:18:32PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > Dear PSC, All, > > For your delectation, RFC5 > > This document proposes to switch GEOS to C++11 as > minimum supported version of C++ language. +1 let's simplify those "for" loops with

Re: [geos-devel] RFC 5: C++11 Compilation Mode

2017-03-29 Thread Regina Obe
this will inconvenience me. Thanks, Regina -Original Message- From: geos-devel [mailto:geos-devel-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 5:19 PM To: geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org Subject: [geos-devel] RFC 5: C++11 Compilation Mode Dear PSC, All, For your

[geos-devel] RFC 5: C++11 Compilation Mode

2017-03-29 Thread Mateusz Loskot
Dear PSC, All, For your delectation, RFC5 This document proposes to switch GEOS to C++11 as minimum supported version of C++ language. Please review, provide your feedback. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net