Re: [geos-devel] Visual C++ project maintenance

2009-04-07 Thread Frank Warmerdam
Mateusz Loskot wrote: Great, feel free to take it over. The same with NMAKE makefiles. AFAIK, Frank is maintaining them (with me as a backup) and perhaps he will continue. Folks, It is still my intention to update the nmake makefiles periodically. Best regards, -- ---

Re: [geos-devel] Visual C++ project maintenance

2009-04-07 Thread Mateusz Loskot
Charlie Savage wrote: > Hi Mateusz, > >> I'm going to drop maintenance of Visual C++ build configurations >> available in form of solution/projects from build/msvc80 >> and build/msvc90. >> >> As I'm the author of these extra modules, should I remove them or >> leave them where they are? Similarly,

Re: [geos-devel] Visual C++ project maintenance

2009-04-07 Thread Charlie Savage
Hi Mateusz, I'm going to drop maintenance of Visual C++ build configurations available in form of solution/projects from build/msvc80 and build/msvc90. As I'm the author of these extra modules, should I remove them or leave them where they are? Similarly, what should I do with build/bjam? I'd

[geos-devel] Visual C++ project maintenance

2009-04-07 Thread Mateusz Loskot
Folks, I'm going to drop maintenance of Visual C++ build configurations available in form of solution/projects from build/msvc80 and build/msvc90. As I'm the author of these extra modules, should I remove them or leave them where they are? Similarly, what should I do with build/bjam? If there i