+1
Dan
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 5:46 PM Sandro Santilli wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:31:06PM -0800, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> > I noticed that the GDAL CoC is in fact just the OSGeo CoC, which is
> convenient, as we are an OSGeo project.
> >
> > The code change is here.
> >
> >
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:31:06PM -0800, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> I noticed that the GDAL CoC is in fact just the OSGeo CoC, which is
> convenient, as we are an OSGeo project.
>
> The code change is here.
>
> https://github.com/libgeos/geos/pull/568
>
> We already have a
> +1 Paul
> +1 Regina
+1
+1
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:31 PM Paul Ramsey
wrote:
> I noticed that the GDAL CoC is in fact just the OSGeo CoC, which is
> convenient, as we are an OSGeo project.
>
> The code change is here.
>
> https://github.com/libgeos/geos/pull/568
>
> We already have a
> +1 Paul
> +1 Regina
>
I noticed that the GDAL CoC is in fact just the OSGeo CoC, which is convenient,
as we are an OSGeo project.
The code change is here.
https://github.com/libgeos/geos/pull/568
We already have a
+1 Paul
+1 Regina
___
geos-devel mailing list
+1 let's just copy it.
Thanks,
Regina
> -Original Message-
> From: geos-devel [mailto:geos-devel-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of
> Paul Ramsey
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 11:46 AM
> To: GEOS Development List
> Subject: Re: [geos-devel] [gdal-dev] GEOS Maintenance Grant
>
As usual, GDAL has a reasonable template to work from.
https://gdal.org/community/code_of_conduct.html#code-of-conduct
I'm happy to have a CoC and happy to just copy someone else's. Other thoughts?
P
> On Feb 16, 2022, at 7:49 AM, Sean Gillies wrote:
>
> Howard,
>
> I'm in favor, but first
Howard,
I'm in favor, but first I'd like to see the GEOS project adopt a code of
conduct. Sponsors look for one these days, right? It's probably a good move
for GEOS in the long run.
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 8:37 AM Howard Butler wrote:
> GDAL PSC,
>
> When we wrote the GDAL RFCs on
+1 from a GEOS PSC member --strk;
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:37:37AM -0600, Howard Butler wrote:
> GDAL PSC,
>
> When we wrote the GDAL RFCs on sponsorship, we provided an escape clause to
> allow us to direct resources to other projects upon which GDAL depends. Our
> sponsorship numbers are
